Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by daniel81 on Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:29 pm
Took some portraits for some friends on the weekend. It was my first attempt at anything like this and I'm pretty pleased with the results. Also my first time shooting with a hotshoe flash (430ex) which was great for fill lighting. Such a big difference compared to the pop up flash! I'd really like some critique and on these shots as its something I'd really like to get better at. Any pointers or tips are much appreciated!   
-
daniel81
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:50 pm
- Location: Woodcroft, Sydney
by gstark on Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:01 pm
Hi Daniel, I'm seeing lots of blown highlights. I'm not sure if it's from the flash or your PP, so first question is, what PP have you applied? My suspicion is that with (what I'm seeing as) the blown highlights, you've used the 430 on full power, or near enough, but you're describing these shots as having used it as "fill" flash. The purpose of fill flash is to provide a little bit extra - some kick, some extra light, if you will - but it's not to be your primary light source .... With something like the 430 on full, it assumes the role of being the primary light source rather than a fill ... And, absent any modifiers (which will be typical usage when mounted on your hotshoe) this will also render some pretty harsh lighting. Second question relates to your specific camera settings for these: you had auto wb set, didn't you?  The wb in the last image is way out. Look at the gentleman's shirt: the whites are blue. Look at the lady's skin hue: it too is blue. As is his. Which brings me to the third concept I'll explore with you: this was a difficult ask: she's white and pale, he's dark and, well, black! Your camera's metering system is toast in a situation like this: do you meter against him, or do you meter against her? Bearing in mind that your meter works off reflected light, you can see that each of these subjects will reflect, into your metering system, different values from each of these people. Which is correct? Neither, and both.  I raise this issue so that you can think about it a little, before we get down to some answers. Perhaps others may choose to add their thoughts? That can hopefully add much value to the knowledge base that you're about to acquire. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by barry on Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:51 pm
Good response Gary. Which brings me to the third concept I'll explore with you: this was a difficult ask: she's white and pale, he's dark and, well, black! Your camera's metering system is toast in a situation like this: do you meter against him, or do you meter against her? Bearing in mind that your meter works off reflected light, you can see that each of these subjects will reflect, into your metering system, different values from each of these people.
The exact same issue faced by every wedding photogragher. Bright white gown and black tux. I tend to expose for the white gown. Nothing worse than a blown wedding gown. Taking a shot like this in sunligt is even worse.
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
-

barry
- Member
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:25 am
- Location: Emu Plains NSW
by daniel81 on Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:37 pm
The 430 was set to full, no diffuser, pointed at the subjects. I learned a lot about the direction of the light source in this shoot, there were a lot of hit and misses let me tell you! I shot with a polarizer on the first 2, which underexposed the shots somewhat. I have played around with PP and increased the brightness & contrast to compensate somewhat for this underexposing. I was going for a high contrast look, so that may be the reason for the blown highlights? The third was natural light, no flash.
-
daniel81
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:50 pm
- Location: Woodcroft, Sydney
by Marvin on Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:44 am
Well I am no good on the technicalities but I love the pose in the second.
Nikon D7000
-

Marvin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.
by Mr Darcy on Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:36 pm
#3 is the standout for me here. I just don't like the lighting in the other two. They are too flat and blown. Like Marvin, I like the pose in #2, but it needs the flash dialed back. #3 as Gary said is is too blue. Try correcting that. I would add a slight amount of light from the viewer's LHS to lighten up the dark side of the face. Perhaps a white card, or a small flash.
Also, I would move your flash off camera (#1,2). Can you use your pop up to trigger your big unit? if so, hold the big flash in your hand, arm outstrectched, and fire away, but dial down the power somewhat. If you can' remote trigger, use a cord to achieve the same result.
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by surenj on Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:46 am
Great captures. I agree with gary that this is a tough one for exposure... Hmm.. Almost something you may bracket and combine  Completely agree with off camera flash if possible. 430EX will work with the cheapo Cactus triggers (most of the time) if you are keen. Unfortunately canon hasn't given us the gift of triggering the off camera flash with the built in one...
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|