Buckley's Falls

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Buckley's Falls

Postby -=Monty=- on Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:14 am

Hi everyone, nice forum!

Anyway, the first day I got my D70 (off ebay), my dad and I went for a little walk to Buckley's Falls.

I took my 18-70mm and my 70-300mm along with me and took some photos.

Here are a couple of the better ones:
Image

Image

Full picture: http://members.optusnet.com.au/armand2/Pictures/Buckley%20076.jpg

So what do you guys think?
(by the way, i'm 13)
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:16 am

Monty - welcome to the forum and what a stunning pic (#1) for your first post.

To get the bird sharp and the movement of the water is fantastic. :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:29 am

G'day Monty,
Great first post! Love both of 'em... Well done... Welcome :-)

Cheers,
Mudder
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:10 pm

I think the second shot is excellent, Monty. Nicely done. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby MHD on Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:15 pm

Welcome to the forum!!
I suggest you put your location in so we can see where these shots come from...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby -=Monty=- on Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:35 pm

ok, i have done that. I'm from geelong, victoria.
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Postby Killakoala on Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:47 pm

Two great pics there Monty. Well done. It's nice to see a bird other than a duck on this forum too. :D
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby -=Monty=- on Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:41 pm

Does anyone actually know what kind of bird that is? Because it seemed really tame and it let me get within 2 meters of it.
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Postby meicw on Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:18 pm

Both great pics. I THINK that is a Bittern (perhaps a Mangrove Bittern going by the colouring.)

Regards
Meicw
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby -=Monty=- on Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:38 pm

Which of the 2 pics do you guys think is better?
D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Monty..

Postby beetleboy on Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:46 pm

That second pic is a ripper..good work Monty!

Liam =]
User avatar
beetleboy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Highbury, Adelaide

Postby kipper on Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:46 pm

Although I like the colors in the waterful which match the colors in the bird, I find it's just a little bit soft. Whereas the second photo is sharp as a Zwelling Henckel Knife, which I might add is very sharp :) So I'd have to go the 2nd as my favorite.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby -=Monty=- on Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:08 am

Being new to digital photgraphy and everything, i was really amazed at the clarity, sharpness and colours the D70 gave me.

It really is a great camera.

Although, the only thing that has bothered me is the fact that there is no iso 100. BTW, i would recomend you click the link for the larger picture because that is when you really see the sharpness.
D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Postby kipper on Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:58 am

The fullsize images were the ones I was talking about :)
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:19 am

Cool catch of the bird in the second picture. Sharp and well exposed. Well done.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby -=Monty=- on Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:08 am

The onboard flash just lightened the bird up a bit. It worked really well because i was so close to the bird.
D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques