Dawesy star Witness for the defenseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dawesy star Witness for the defenseDawesy decided he'd help me set up the Paul's brollies and we'd have a quick sessions mucking around with dual SB-800s, unfortunately knucklehead here didn't bring D200 batteries, so I was shooting with the D70 that did the job well.
Anways shot 1, Dawesy was attempting to hide his identity. Little did he know that he couldn't hide from dual SB-800s BAM! And finally a more pensive moment.. he was too close to the brollie on the RHS so I've kept the image bright. Edit : Added another darker version for review. Last edited by Alpha_7 on Tue May 22, 2007 10:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Good stuff Craig!
I like the very obvious contrast from images one and two. The SHB as a background also gives a very corporate type feel to it. I agree that in the last one, whilst it's a great B&W conversion -the right side of Dawsey's face is too bright. Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Craig, these are great efforts with the lighting. There is sufficient contrast to make the images 'pop' without being unflattering. As you and Geoff said, the last one is a little bright.
Cheers Patrick Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Craig
#2 is superb. the light, while artifical, has a natural feel to it. The B & W needs to be half way between your two versions IMHO (ie dodge the left and burn the right or do a grad ND across the frame right to left) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |