Actually, it's Kate. But it reminded me of Priscilla Queen of the Dessert.
Warning: nudity.
First
Second
The second one had a bit of work done in Virtual Photographer, a filter plug-in for Photoshop, as well as deliberately introduced vignetting. Tell me if it works or not, or if I've gone too far in screwing with it.
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Priscilla Queen of the DessertModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Priscilla Queen of the Dessert
2nd one is great
it's a real improvement from the other full nudes for the first one i would of framed it so shes off centre
Onyx - we are seeing you improve with each shoot u do!
I like both of these but the first one particularly seems quite over sharpened to me on my monitor. I prefer the 2nd image here. Well done brother! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
The 2nd is definitely better than the first, although it's hard to get the full effect when you have to pan around inside a web browser.
Here I was expecting some twist to the pictures (maybe with some sort of confectionery) but apparently you meant desert instead of dessert. 
Chi,
They're both very good, but you need to cut back on the sharpening that you're doing here. They're both oversharpened, and the first by quite a bit. In the first, look at the area where the underside of the model's left arm meets the background - there's significant haloing there. In the second, the feet almost seem to be lifted into a different plane from that of the rocks upon which Kate is standing. Not as bad as the first, but I think you're taking the sharpening too far, but then failing to pull it back enough. Cheerz. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks for your comments. These shots came from the very first shoot I did, now 3 weeks ago, by which stage I just about knew nothing and had learnt nothing... well now, I had learnt from my Flickr gallery that some of what I find mundane other ppl tend to really like, and what I think are great shots others find ho-hum. So I'll increasingly post my crappy pics and see what the reaction is.
I am aware of the oversharpening, as these were prepared for printing - and it's also why they're a not web friendly 1440x960 res (at 240dpi, that's almost a perfect 6x4). And sorry, no sugary treats in this thread... I should learn me some grammar! 
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
