Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by DaveB on Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:59 am
I've put a little gallery of these up at my site. Please have a look.
As a taster here are 3 of the images:
Dropping in
This shot was just as the bird was gaining speed after take-off.
Another landing, this time taken in infrared.
Incidentally, these images were processed through Lightroom 1.0, which also produced the HTML gallery. The B&W IR images have had pre-processing done by IRaw Mono (and some with LightZone).
-

DaveB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Box Hill, Vic
by lukeo on Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:22 pm
Dont be worried about lack of replies it's not a reflection on your work, i learnt that one, people are just busy. Take me for instance I saw these last night but didnt respond as I was tired.
My opinion great work, crisp, clear, noise free. The second one is a winner composition wise for me, it's just perfect.
-
lukeo
- Member
-
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
- Location: Kensington, WA
-
by kamran on Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:13 pm
Amazing images, clean and sharp! Well done.
Cheers,
Kamran
Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
-

kamran
- Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:16 am
- Location: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
by surenj on Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:25 am
Great shots...2nd one is my favourite... The other two have the out of focus birds which could be distracting somewhat...
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by bwhinnen on Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:58 am
2nd and 3rd for me. The second is a great image and I like the third because there are so many other gannets watching this one come in for landing, with the exception of a couple who are just too busy cleaning oh and the one oblivious to it's impending trouncing right in the center where the gannet is about to land atop of it 
-

bwhinnen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
- Location: Cornubia, Brisbane
-
by fozzie on Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:03 am
Dave - inspirational shooting. If I had to pick one of the three, # 1 - Dropping in. Sharp, with fantastic colour and composition: with the Gannet's head looking down for a position to land, and with wings fully extended.
I have also had a look at the gallery
fozzie
-

fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by DaveB on Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:37 am
lukeo wrote:The second one is a winner composition wise for me, it's just perfect.
Thanks. One thing that makes this shot even sweeter for me is that I had to apply NO cropping. Sometimes I find myself tweaking the composition slightly (sometimes dramatically, as in #1). This shot was at 210mm on the 100-400mm zoom.
Thanks for checking out the gallery Fozzie: it's your "fault" I have this Sidekick mount which made shooting these a joy!
-

DaveB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Box Hill, Vic
by DaveB on Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:39 am
bwhinnen wrote:I like the third because there are so many other gannets watching this one come in for landing, with the exception of a couple who are just too busy cleaning oh and the one oblivious to it's impending trouncing right in the center where the gannet is about to land atop of it 
If you're looking at those details, what did you think of the 3rd image in the gallery?
-

DaveB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Box Hill, Vic
by Oscar on Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:51 am
Great shots Dave, I love #1 & #2 in the thread. Checked out your gallery and they are all cool pics too.
Well done!
Cheers, Mick 
-

Oscar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
- Location: Panania, Sydney
by BBJ on Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:53 am
Dave, i really like these shots all great but #1 does it for as well, just like the bird that way looks really good.
John
BBJ
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-

BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by bwhinnen on Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:15 am
DaveB wrote:bwhinnen wrote:I like the third because there are so many other gannets watching this one come in for landing, with the exception of a couple who are just too busy cleaning oh and the one oblivious to it's impending trouncing right in the center where the gannet is about to land atop of it 
If you're looking at those details, what did you think of the 3rd image in the gallery?
Love it! "I'm going to get you!" would be an apt title
I also really like the 9th one in you gallery too!
-

bwhinnen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
- Location: Cornubia, Brisbane
-
by stubbsy on Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:37 am
Dave
I looked at these a few times before I've commented. For some reason I keep coming back to the images yet can't quite nail their appeal. I THINK it's the simplicity of the shots. There are other birds for context, but in each of these images the eye is strongly drawn to a single bird. Oddly I really like #3 yet technically I'd say it's the weakest of the three (the bird's wings are fairly blurred towards the tips, there's that large OOF bird at the front etc), yet the B & W treatment (and I guess the IR of which you are a master  ) give this an odd ethereal quality
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|