Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by avkomp on Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:54 pm
nope, this isnt me (I am butt ugly but dont look like a frog), but if you look at the image you will see that I have captured an unintentional self portrait.
I havent seen a frog around here for years, but last night whilst taking out the garbage, I see one so I thought I would try for a few shots.
I ran inside and got the gear, and had the sb800 with lspj in the left hand and the cam in the right.
My aim was to vary a few settings and see the effects of the flash and lspj (on the end of sc-28 ) being placed at different positions.
unfortunately after 3 shots he took off. didnt know frogs could go that fast so I dont know where he went
100% crop of the eye to show my self portrait:
unfortunately none of the 3 shots was any good but I havent posted for a while and am happy to have seen a frog.
This was my favourite of the 3 shots I got off before froggy took off:
wanted more DOF but he was away before I could do too much
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by moggy on Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:40 pm
Nice series of shots, Steve, I've noticed frogs around my place over the last few months not having seen them before.
 Bob.
.
-

moggy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s
by avkomp on Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:42 pm
thanks bob.
it is really posted to show the reflection of me in the eye, did you see it??
that is where the self portrait comes into it.
thought I would get onto the self portrait bandwagon
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by blacknstormy on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:18 pm
What a cutie  (well, I am a girl  )
In case you don't know, it is a striped marsh frog, Litoria peroni
Rel
-

blacknstormy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
- Location: Ipswich Qld
-
by avkomp on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:23 pm
thanks Rel.
I was going to ask what sort of frog it is.
It also had what appeared to be ticks on it. Is this a possibility??
would have thought that ticks wouldnt like to go swimming, or perhaps this guy doesnt get to the water very often, although he looked pretty wet to me.
I thought for sure someone would comment about the self portrait though
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by Slider on Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:10 pm
Very nice . Love the self portrait 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by avkomp on Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:23 pm
slider:
did you see the genuine self portrait in the froggys eye?? it really is there.
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by Slider on Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:08 pm
avkomp wrote:slider:
did you see the genuine self portrait in the froggys eye?? it really is there.
Steve
Sure did. That was what I was referring to. Brilliant 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by avkomp on Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:16 pm
thanks mark,
I thought you were suggesting I look like a frog!!
I really only posted the frog because of the self portraits being shot but everyone is commenting on the frog and not my portrait
If the frog was a good shot, I would probably clone me out.
interesting reason why lights typically make nicer portraits than flash:
If ambient light is down, our pupils dilate and the flash captures that.
If there are lights, our pupils are small, generally producing more pleasing eyes.
I think the eye of this guy could have been magic in more light.
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by LostDingo on Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:28 am
the first one is a great shot even with the butt ugly fella in it 
-

LostDingo
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
- Location: Rozelle
by Oneputt on Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:36 am
Steve if I am not mistaken you were using a lightsphere. It can be seen in the frogs eye?
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by avkomp on Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:46 am
oneputt: yep lightsphere II PJ, the reflection gives the game away. thats why I called it a self portrait
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by Oneputt on Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:55 am
A nice accident Steve 
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by nito on Sat Mar 18, 2006 9:33 am
now that is detail, if you can capture yourself in the eye of a frog. Nice series of shots.
-
nito
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
- Location: Gladesville, NSW
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|