Comments on this B&W conversion

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Comments on this B&W conversion

Postby ozonejunkie on Sat May 06, 2006 6:54 pm

I was out at Mt Ginnini last night around midnight ish, and not only did I freeze, but I got some interesting photos. FWIW: Ground temperature was -0.2, air temp was not much higher, and there was frost everywhere.

What do people think of this pic:
Image

24"/f4.5/ISO400 @ 28mm

I have mixed feelings about it, but am starting to like it. Any comments?

Cheers,
Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby NJ on Sat May 06, 2006 6:59 pm

its interesting, but i think the contrast is a tad high... the trees are very bright on the eyes :lol: unless its just my LCD.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby avkomp on Sat May 06, 2006 7:05 pm

interesting,

But I also feel the contrast is too high for this shot.

STeve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Willy wombat on Sun May 07, 2006 1:03 am

A little bit busy for me Tristan. Conversion is also a little too high key
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Killakoala on Sun May 07, 2006 8:23 am

Although the image does not hold much interest for me, i do like the PP treatment you have done. Perhaps keep that one for some other subject in the future. it could be useful.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Manta on Sun May 07, 2006 8:37 am

Tristan - I agree with Killa that this style may come in useful down the track but I don't think it works well with this subject. The image is very cluttered and the eye wanders around for a bit before settling, in my case, on that apparently floating tree in the centre. The shadow across the trunk makes it look like there's a big chunk missing!
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby ozonejunkie on Mon May 08, 2006 12:41 pm

Thanks for the comments guys, it is interesting seeing what other people make of it. :)
I am still undecided, but I do prefer a more tightly cropped version. I have had some people tell me that I love it, and others hateing it.

Thanks for your comments,
Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques