What do people think of this pic:
24"/f4.5/ISO400 @ 28mm
I have mixed feelings about it, but am starting to like it. Any comments?
Cheers,
Tristan
Comments on this B&W conversionModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Comments on this B&W conversionI was out at Mt Ginnini last night around midnight ish, and not only did I freeze, but I got some interesting photos. FWIW: Ground temperature was -0.2, air temp was not much higher, and there was frost everywhere.
What do people think of this pic: 24"/f4.5/ISO400 @ 28mm I have mixed feelings about it, but am starting to like it. Any comments? Cheers, Tristan Canon User
Web: http://www.ozonejunkie.com/ Gallery: http://photos.ozonejunkie.com
its interesting, but i think the contrast is a tad high... the trees are very bright on the eyes
![]() Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
interesting,
But I also feel the contrast is too high for this shot. STeve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
A little bit busy for me Tristan. Conversion is also a little too high key
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Although the image does not hold much interest for me, i do like the PP treatment you have done. Perhaps keep that one for some other subject in the future. it could be useful.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Tristan - I agree with Killa that this style may come in useful down the track but I don't think it works well with this subject. The image is very cluttered and the eye wanders around for a bit before settling, in my case, on that apparently floating tree in the centre. The shadow across the trunk makes it look like there's a big chunk missing!
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks for the comments guys, it is interesting seeing what other people make of it.
![]() I am still undecided, but I do prefer a more tightly cropped version. I have had some people tell me that I love it, and others hateing it. Thanks for your comments, Tristan Canon User
Web: http://www.ozonejunkie.com/ Gallery: http://photos.ozonejunkie.com
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|