Back in time

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Back in time

Postby gleff on Sun May 28, 2006 8:14 pm

Just wondering if I can get some critique from the following two images. Both are of the same thing but using different filters. Which one works better. The original was actually quite boring. I personally like the second one better, but the first one is probably just as fitting because it has a ghostly feel.

This was taken in the 1st class area of the Quarantine station.

Image

Image

Critiques welcome.

Thanks
Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
User avatar
gleff
Senior Member
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70

Postby birddog114 on Sun May 28, 2006 8:19 pm

Second
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Sun May 28, 2006 8:19 pm

To suit the title Geoff image #2 stands out. Even the burnt out windows indicates a back in time theme - love it :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby big pix on Sun May 28, 2006 8:23 pm

2 for me ....... the pix has an old look.....
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby leek on Sun May 28, 2006 8:23 pm

Aha... now I know what you wanted that filter for...

#2 is definitely much better...

It might also be worth playing around with the film type and ISO settings of Virtual Photographer to introduce a little more grain...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Sun May 28, 2006 8:25 pm

Definitely #2 Geoff - #1 is way too blue. Done using OptikVerv filters?

I'm also not a big fan of the frame
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby gleff on Sun May 28, 2006 8:28 pm

stubbsy wrote:Definitely #2 Geoff - #1 is way too blue. Done using OptikVerv filters?

I'm also not a big fan of the frame


yep. I really like the OptikVerv filters.. I have quite a few shots that look very ordinary, and it's probably only fitting to make such a historic place look historic :)

As far as the frame.. yeh.. I think i've got a bad habbit of using it. When I post them all on my website once PP'd, i'll probably ditch the frame.

Thanks for all the comments guys.. I new I liked #2 for a reason.

Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
User avatar
gleff
Senior Member
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70

Postby Bodak on Sun May 28, 2006 8:28 pm

#2 is much more suited I feel, the blue does nothing for me.
Life is

Stephen
Bodak
Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Somerville Victoria

Postby Geoff on Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm

Geoff - #2 for sure, the 'satin steel' effect (am I right here?) really doesn't suit the theme as already stated by Chris. I really do like the 2nd one - where are the rest of your images from the tour? :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby gleff on Sun May 28, 2006 8:43 pm

Geoff wrote:Geoff - #2 for sure, the 'satin steel' effect (am I right here?) really doesn't suit the theme as already stated by Chris. I really do like the 2nd one - where are the rest of your images from the tour? :)


You know the funny thing is, I wasn't paying attention to the actual filter name, so it'll be fun trying to find the one I used when I do it again :) I was just experimenting with them to see if I can make a pretty unflattering photo and give it a bit of charm. I think it worked well. Now to just find which filter I used hehe..

I've taken roughly 250 photo's from the quarantine station out of which the best ones were the rock carvings I think. I'll know for sure when I start PP'ing. It will take me a while over the next few days to do PP on most of them though, and then I need to get them on my site. I'll repost to this thread when available. Unfortunately, the first few shots with the flash didn't turn out at all.. I was using all the wrong settings and they just didn't work. Once I figured out what was wrong, it was smooth sailing.

Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
User avatar
gleff
Senior Member
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70

Postby avkomp on Sun May 28, 2006 9:14 pm

#2 is the better, more in keeping with the era of the q.s.

sTeve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Slider on Sun May 28, 2006 9:28 pm

# 2 has the better colour for the theme. As for the shot itself. Great. Beautifully composed. :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby O1 on Sun May 28, 2006 10:11 pm

Geoff
I really do like the second shot very much.
A great example of high pushing the high lights works

Great stuff

Owen
O1
Newbie
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: Tassie Hobart

Postby ABG on Mon May 29, 2006 2:15 pm

Geoff,

The second works much better for me. The effect in the 1st image is overbearing for mine.

I learnt at one of the PS forums at PIW that you can achieve the same effects (and achieve a much more subtle variation of the first image) by creating a new hue/saturation adjustment layer and clicking on the colorize button. Move the hue slider until you've got roughly what you want and then fine tune with the sturation slider.
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby gleff on Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:44 pm

For those interested, my gallery is finally uploaded to my website with the photos I took at the quarantine station.

http://www.gleff.com/photogallery/

Enjoy.
Geoff
http://www.gleff.com
_________________
D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
User avatar
gleff
Senior Member
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:49 pm
Location: Chatswood, NSW - Nikon D70

Postby antman on Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:59 pm

Nice work Geoff.

Pic 1 looks quite unnatural, whereas pic 2 seems absolutely perfect.
Geoff C

My Gallery:http://geoffc.smugmug.com/
User avatar
antman
Member
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Frenchs Forest, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:04 pm

Geoff
I like them both! The first one has a different feel to it....almost a touch of Hollywood. Nice image and sharp as a tack.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques