



http://www.kayimages.com/2007/angie/DSC_2425.jpg
Warning: pink bits
Model shoot: AngelaModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Model shoot: AngelaThis time, I played around in photoshop to make it less crap. I think I got the opposite result...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() http://www.kayimages.com/2007/angie/DSC_2425.jpg Warning: pink bits
the 2nd one is a better treatment
i would tend not to oversaturate in this sort of light The light is much more interesting in the 4th and 5th shot and interesting thing about her shirt aportos chicken did a similar shirt as a cross promotional thing for models to wear it said don't feed the models and on the back it read 'because that's our job'
umm ... she might not like the look of her armpit in the pink bits photo ... kinda looks like it could be hairy/stubbly.
lol armpit hair... I should definitely take more notice of these things before I post em.
![]() The 'light' in the 4th and 5th Wendell was actually me playing with gaussian blur of the background/overlay layer to give a glow to the model. After reviewing all my shot images with flat lighting, I figured something different would be nice. I don't know exactly how to extract the most from her pasty white skin.
Number three is my pick of the bunch. The pose, the colour and the light is appealing to me. The last one is great to, but the lighting let's it down. A reflector of fill-in-flash was needed here.
Good work again Chi. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|