Model shoot: Angela

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Model shoot: Angela

Postby Onyx on Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:59 pm

This time, I played around in photoshop to make it less crap. I think I got the opposite result...

ImageImage

ImageImage

http://www.kayimages.com/2007/angie/DSC_2425.jpg
Warning: pink bits
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Kyle on Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:02 pm

Love the 2nd, in b&w. nice work :)

Also, love the 5th :P
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby wendellt on Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:23 pm

the 2nd one is a better treatment

i would tend not to oversaturate in this sort of light

The light is much more interesting in the 4th and 5th shot


and interesting thing about her shirt

aportos chicken did a similar shirt as a cross promotional thing for models to wear

it said don't feed the models and on the back it read 'because that's our job'
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby mattyjacobs on Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:32 pm

umm ... she might not like the look of her armpit in the pink bits photo ... kinda looks like it could be hairy/stubbly.
User avatar
mattyjacobs
Member
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby Onyx on Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:57 pm

lol armpit hair... I should definitely take more notice of these things before I post em. ;)

The 'light' in the 4th and 5th Wendell was actually me playing with gaussian blur of the background/overlay layer to give a glow to the model. After reviewing all my shot images with flat lighting, I figured something different would be nice. I don't know exactly how to extract the most from her pasty white skin.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Killakoala on Tue Jan 09, 2007 9:35 pm

Number three is my pick of the bunch. The pose, the colour and the light is appealing to me. The last one is great to, but the lighting let's it down. A reflector of fill-in-flash was needed here.

Good work again Chi.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques