Two fungi macros

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Two fungi macros

Postby johnd on Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:24 pm

I shot some fungi macros on the weekend. I particularly liked these two.

Image

Image


Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Pehpsi on Wed Jun 13, 2007 3:02 am

Very nice, like the second more with the extra background. Great colours and focus too :)
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby Pa on Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:46 am

i like them john...the only niggle i have is the tight crop on the first.


cheers pa
cheers pa

http://pa.smugmug.com

Work it's part of your life.....So make it an enjoyable part of it.
User avatar
Pa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: old bar, NSW 2430

Postby ATJ on Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:48 am

The muted colours are great.

I agree with Pa about the tight crop. I'm also not sure if I like the stalks out of focus or not.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby johnd on Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:56 pm

Thanks guys. Pa and ATJ, I'll have another look at the original to see if there some more in the image so the crop won't be so tight.

ATJ, with the stalks, this shot was taken at f16 with the front of the lens only a few inches away from the fungi. Even at f16 you get stuff all dof. If I go up to f22 or even higher to get the dof, I reckon the aperture will be too small to get enough light in. These were taken at ISO 200. Maybe I need to get a S5 so I can go up to ISO 1600 and f22. Now there's a thought. :)

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby ATJ on Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:06 pm

John,

If that is the case, you're probably not going to see too much difference between f/16 and f/22. Assuming you are using a tripod, you could probably try a range of apertures so you can pick the best DOF for the image.

A larger aperture may have put the stalk more out of focus to make it less noticeable.

To be honest, it is not a big distraction to me and the image is very good as is.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby colin_12 on Sat Jun 16, 2007 6:07 pm

These are quite good John.
You may also consider moving a little further away from your subject so that you can get a little more DOF. There are some wild fungi out there.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Postby johnd on Sat Jun 16, 2007 6:36 pm

That's a good point Colin. I just returned home half an hour ago from another fungi shoot and after looking at the images thought the exact same thing. Not much dof again. Next time I'll get back a bit further and up ISO so I can go with a slightly smaller aperture.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby crackatoea on Sat Jun 16, 2007 8:22 pm

Amazing how different each one is yet I like both heaps. Great detail and focus
crackatoea
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Kanwal, Central Coast, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques