

Cheers
John
Two fungi macrosModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Two fungi macrosI shot some fungi macros on the weekend. I particularly liked these two.
![]() ![]() Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Very nice, like the second more with the extra background. Great colours and focus too
![]() Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Thanks guys. Pa and ATJ, I'll have another look at the original to see if there some more in the image so the crop won't be so tight.
ATJ, with the stalks, this shot was taken at f16 with the front of the lens only a few inches away from the fungi. Even at f16 you get stuff all dof. If I go up to f22 or even higher to get the dof, I reckon the aperture will be too small to get enough light in. These were taken at ISO 200. Maybe I need to get a S5 so I can go up to ISO 1600 and f22. Now there's a thought. ![]() Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
John,
If that is the case, you're probably not going to see too much difference between f/16 and f/22. Assuming you are using a tripod, you could probably try a range of apertures so you can pick the best DOF for the image. A larger aperture may have put the stalk more out of focus to make it less noticeable. To be honest, it is not a big distraction to me and the image is very good as is.
That's a good point Colin. I just returned home half an hour ago from another fungi shoot and after looking at the images thought the exact same thing. Not much dof again. Next time I'll get back a bit further and up ISO so I can go with a slightly smaller aperture.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|