C&C Welcome - especially around PP of the cat.


Old Dog and Young Cat - new PP!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Old Dog and Young Cat - new PP!Cat is ours - Spotted the dog in the local park
C&C Welcome - especially around PP of the cat. ![]() ![]() Last edited by dviv on Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Great shot of the cat, the goldie wouldn't stand a chance
![]() I would be tempted to crop out the OOF left part of the cat photo. You have some great detail in the rest of the image and for me, the OOF section takes a bit away from it. Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
I like the crop of the cat, but I find the out of focus highlights distracting.
I think this would be a good play image by trying to darken off the OOF highlights but keep the wiskers as they are. I think this would add to the effect of eyes drawn into the cats eye. Id play like that for a bit before trying to crop if it didnt work. Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
Not too keen on the dog, but the cat shot is great - don't play too much with it, perhaps burn a little on the whisker to make it darker and less distracting. I think the OOF area provides a nice balance to the picture.
Once you have it how you like it, make sure it gets printed up nice and big! *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
I'm with the others. #2 is wonderful but I'd crop a small amount from the left to reduce the amount of OOF image.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Great shot of the cat
![]() I'd also crop some from the left though. Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Thanks for all your comments again. I've played a bit and come up with an almost square crop, with the whiskers burned a bit.
Is it too dark? I kinda like the darker look but not 100% decided..... I'd love to hear your thoughts: ![]()
Yes the crop is spot on but now it's too dark.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I will differ (meaning everyone else is wrong) and say the 1st amended version (the cropped but dark version) is spot on. Cats stalk and are therefore generally stealthy (is that a word). The dark fur (with still a lot of detail) and dark green eye, showing a reflection of what the cat sees, gives it a steely, predatory feel to it.
My only qualm is that it is a cat! Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Thanks Patrick. To an extent I agree - although it also depends on which monitor I look at it. I think when it's a full size pic it looks better dark, but in the 800 resize it looks better light.... Guess I'll just have to get them both printed and see ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|