| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by bwhinnen on Fri Nov 26, 2004 7:49 pm
 I'll add more as I get through them.
 This was my first hand held attempt with a subject and water. Was taken at the top waterfall in the Chinese Gardens, Darling Harbour, the willing subject is my wife    Shutter priority, 1/2 second F/22. 28-80G. I do notice the overexposed area and it bugs me...
   Cheers
 Brett 
			
				 bwhinnen
Senior Member Posts: 1234Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 amLocation: Cornubia, Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by xerubus on Fri Nov 26, 2004 7:59 pm
 great shot... especially with the slow shutter speed... your wife must have been perfectly still ...
 the over exposure can't really be helped with the direct sun... but i've given it a go for you... sorry... that's about the best i can do....
  
			
				 xerubus
Senior Member Posts: 2740Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pmLocation: Nth Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Killakoala on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:08 pm
 It's a really good attempt to get the effect you were after. Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
 
		
		
			
			
 by xerubus on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:10 pm
 brett ... those meerkats are wonderful... well done. 
			
				 xerubus
Senior Member Posts: 2740Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pmLocation: Nth Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by bago100 on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:10 pm
 Good photo
 I've tried to crop the photo and see how that looks.  Hope you don't mind.
   Rule of thirds can't be used here when this is done unfortunately
 Was the overblown right hand side obvious in the preview screen?
 Cheers
 Graham 
			
				 bago100
Senior Member Posts: 862Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pmLocation: Shanghai China until Feb 2010 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Killakoala on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:11 pm
 Those Meerkats are absolutely sensational. They are one of my most favorite animals.
 I love how you've gotten them to stand to attention on command    They must have known you were taking their photo and posed for you.Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Glen on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:13 pm
 Brett,
 great shot! can see the concentration on your wifes face, obviously you told her not to move.
 
 Bago,
 
 Well done, "neat and in the middle"
 
			
				 Glen
Moderator Posts: 11819Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Neutral Bay -   Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by bwhinnen on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:25 pm
 Glen wrote:Brett,
 great shot! can see the concentration on your wifes face, obviously you told her not to move.
 
 Bago,
 
 Well done, "neat and in the middle"
 No I think that was the "Have you taken the photo yet" look, I asked her to stay still in the next one...
 Crop does look better and a good idea    Yeah the blown section was there in the preview, but I didn't want to underexpose as I wasn't sure how much I could have recovered.
 The standing to attention of the Meerkats is a trick they've learnt when someone walks up to their enclosure holding a bag near the edge of the wall. I think half of all the photos I took at Taronga were of the Meerkats, my wife adores them.
 Cheers
 Brett 
			
				 bwhinnen
Senior Member Posts: 1234Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 amLocation: Cornubia, Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Glen on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:32 pm
 Brett, 
 after the first 3,000 photos taken of my wife round the house she doesn't even pay any attention to me any more when the camera comes out    
			
				 Glen
Moderator Posts: 11819Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Neutral Bay -   Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by bago100 on Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:47 pm
 Brett
 A little photoshopping and you have this
 What do you think?  
   Cheers
 Graham 
			
				 bago100
Senior Member Posts: 862Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pmLocation: Shanghai China until Feb 2010 
 
		
		
			
			
 by bwhinnen on Fri Nov 26, 2004 9:10 pm
 
Now that I like! Thanks!
 Brett 
			
				 bwhinnen
Senior Member Posts: 1234Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 amLocation: Cornubia, Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by kipper on Fri Nov 26, 2004 9:37 pm
 I've got a good closeup of a meerkat when I went to the Melbourne Zoo.  Thought I had a lot of keepers from the day trip with my sister and nephew but only about 40-50%   
			
				kipper
			Senior Member Posts: 3738Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pmLocation: Hampshire, UK 
 
		
		
			
			
 by bwhinnen on Fri Nov 26, 2004 9:51 pm
 Now this is my favourite animal. A bit young to be called King, so perhaps Prince?
 Shot with the 70-300G @ 130mm through the wonderful glass that everyone uses now.
   Brett 
			
				 bwhinnen
Senior Member Posts: 1234Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 amLocation: Cornubia, Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by kipper on Fri Nov 26, 2004 10:21 pm
 So Brett, is that the Nikkor AFG 70-300mm F4-5.6 lense?
 If so, that is bloody amazing.  Do you have the shooting data for that tiger shot?
 I'm half considering selling my Sigma 70-300mm APO super macro, never been able to achieve those sort of shots with it.  Maybe it's user error I don't know.
 Although I just saw this.....some of them are APO II so I dunno what the difference is:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/browse?id=28325 
			
				kipper
			Senior Member Posts: 3738Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pmLocation: Hampshire, UK 
 
		
		
			
			
 by bwhinnen on Fri Nov 26, 2004 10:33 pm
 kipper wrote:So Brett, is that the Nikkor AFG 70-300mm F4-5.6 lense? If so, that is bloody amazing.  Do you have the shooting data for that tiger shot? I'm half considering selling my Sigma 70-300mm APO super macro, never been able to achieve those sort of shots with it.  Maybe it's user error I don't know. Although I just saw this.....some of them are APO II so I dunno what the difference is:http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/browse?id=28325
 Yes it is that lens, I've heard (never used the Sigma as the APO II was more expensive and the 70-300G was a lens to learn with) that the APO II is a good lens.
 Focal Length: 130mm
 1/80 sec - F/4.2
 Sensitivity: ISO 200
 Tone Comp: User-Defined Custom Curve (WW 3.5)
 One thing that I always do with the 70-300G is use the UnSharp Mask feature under Nikon Capture, which really helps bring out the detail in the photo.
 I've found the WW 3.5 curve to give me the best results with what I shoot straight off camera in good lighting.
 Cheers
 Brett 
			
				 bwhinnen
Senior Member Posts: 1234Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 amLocation: Cornubia, Brisbane
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Mj on Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:04 pm
 Just goes to show the 70-300 lens can get great results... just have to have the right conditions and light levels though otherwise it can be hard going to get that elusive shot. 
			
				 Mj
Senior Member Posts: 1048Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pmLocation: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia} 
 
		
		
			
			
 by kipper on Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:30 pm
 I assume this photo was taken freestanding, no tripod etc.
 ps. I only have the APO I not the II, not sure what the difference is.  Whether the optics are greatly improved or whether it was something else in the lense that they changed.
 pps. my cat is cuter - http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=1091 
			
				kipper
			Senior Member Posts: 3738Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pmLocation: Hampshire, UK 
 
		
		
			
			
 by wile_E on Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:02 am
 love the shot of the tiger brett! 
 awesome awesome awesome    
			
				 wile_E
Member Posts: 198Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:34 pmLocation: Maroubra, Sydney 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Killakoala on Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:30 am
 Tigers make great subjects. You've nailed some 'life' in that animal too. Well done... Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |