|
Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 by NikonUser on Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:26 pm
There wasn't much out there for macros today. Probably a little chilly this morning.
I found this freaky looking fly...
ISO200, 1/160 @ f20
It looks alright at web size but printed out at a4 it looks a little 'painted'. I'm not sure quite why.
I was hoping that the reflection wouldn't be quite so big in the eyes. The flash made it look not quite so freaky.
Comments welcome
P.S. For all those that read my thread about my SB-800 underexposing... I think it was the diffusers fault. I took it off today and it was MUCH better. I knew the diffuser stole some light but the difference was HUGE. The only trouble is I like the softer shadows when the diffuser is used 
Paul
-
NikonUser
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
- Location: Canberra - **D2X**
-
by NikonUser on Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:32 pm
...And the spider to match the fly...
Enjoy
Paul
-
NikonUser
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
- Location: Canberra - **D2X**
-
by mudder on Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:34 pm
G'day Paul,
The first fly on acid really freaked me out, but the spider having lunch is terrific! The focus is spot on...
Aka Andrew
-
mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by NikonUser on Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:52 am
Thanks Mudder...
One of very few that I actually DO get 'spot' on with focus!
Paul
-
NikonUser
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
- Location: Canberra - **D2X**
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|
