Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by kipper on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:50 pm
Image processing has been fairly slow over the past few weeks as I've been working on my website. Upgraded my hosting on Aussie Hosts so that I have 3 domains associated with the hosting, 5dbs and numerous php applications to chose from via the plesk administration interface. I've spent the past 3-5 days when I've had the opportunity to tweak the website from the default template to my own look and feel. Although a fair bit of work still needs to be done.
Anyway onto the picture. Went out to Banyule Flats and a few other places this morning in search of the Sacred Kingfisher that I saw the other week and also to look for any Azure Kingfishers along the river. However no luck on either fronts even after walking from 6.30 to 11am with all of my photogear (~12kg). I ditched the tripod + wimberley today as I knew I was going to be doing a lot of walking, could do with a monopod I think  Was walking along the fields at Banyule when I noticed these guys gliding around. I spotted one in a tree and approached it and was fairly close. I never have seen a Woodswallow before but immediately recognised the similar beak and body structure to the post that Paul made recently so I knew it was some sort of Woodswallow. I managed to get the 500MM out and decided to ditch the 1.4x in favour of more stops and less weight. I ended up taking this handheld with no flash used or mounted.
ISO400, F8, 1/250, Centre Weighted
<img src="http://www.darrylmorgan.com/photos/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=56&g2_GALLERYSID=7b9507cc9fb65c99e95a93bf5261cde4" width="534" height="800" alt="">
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by big pix on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:54 pm
wow....... a very fine bird pix........ I am yet to try pix's of birds but what I have seen this takes a lot of time and patience...... I will give it a go soon with my old and beat-up 500 mirror lens........
Last edited by big pix on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by wendellt on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:54 pm
excellent shot, i have no idea how far you were away form it but it's technically spot on, considering you were handholding a 500mm monster
you should get someone to take a photo of you working, i would like to see how you handle that lens
Congratulations on the new site as well, it's a lot of work but having your own site feels like owning a country in the digital world!
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by kipper on Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:00 am
How I handle it Wendell - with great difficulty
I found lugging the lens around isn't so bad without the tripod and head, with the added weight of that it really makes hiking/walking tiring. I can't wait for Nikon to produce a VR set of long primes. I'm still trying to find a decent technique for handholding. I'm trying various combos - supporting it at the lensfoot, supporting it at the focusing ring, supporting it at the hood. I probably should of opted here for less aperture and more shutter seeing as I wasn't using the TC I could of probably gone around F5 - F5.6 and still have a tack sharp image. Distance from the bird was around 5-6M.
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by BBJ on Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:07 am
Hi Darryl, thats a nice birdy, and i dont know how you do it as i wouldnt know any really from your common spoggy , starling etc... all i know is they are hard to shoot, so well done.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-

BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by avkomp on Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:01 am
sweet light, good shot, tack sharp.
you obviously have got good technique handholding the 500
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by marcotrov on Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:13 am
Beautifully taken Kipper.  Handheld too, as wendell says you must have good technique. Good job but you are right get a monopod and it will make a big difference not only to your photos taken with monster lenses but to walking with a heavy pack. I use mine as a walking stick too.
cheers
marco
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by Glen on Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:20 am
Kipper, your website looks good, the brown and black go well together. Look forward to seeing it full of your images
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by cc@t on Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:37 am
Upgraded my hosting on Aussie Hosts so that I have 3 domains associated with the hosting, 5dbs and numerous php applications to chose from via the plesk administration interface.
That's not contagious is it??
Excellent shot of the bird!!
-

cc@t
- Member
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 10:34 am
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
by Slider on Tue Nov 15, 2005 12:25 am
Brilliant shot Kipper especially given it's handheld. That is a very nice lens 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by Oneputt on Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:10 am
That is a lovely shot Darryl  I do not even recall seeing that bird before.
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|