
We are all individualsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
We are all individuals![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Take a seat anyone ?
I like this, my only nitpick is I'd crop the top just a little to remove the distracting OOF object on the far left
Cropping the top to avoid the OOF bit in the left corner is sage advice - but it is a remedy after the event.
The annoying intrusion could also be removed at the time of capture with a slightly more elevated viewpoint and this would retain the full contingent of metallic hoops. These things often slip past our attention because of the way that any modern SLR works. With full-aperture viewing and focussing many items like this simply can't be seen through the viewfinder. Add to that the reduced size of the viewfinder image on a 1.52- or 1.6-crop and it is nigh on impossible to see such stuff. A quick jab on the stop-down button and a study of the image will reveal all - and also give a better appraisal of the relationship between near and far detail. Cheers, _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
On reflection, if it is to be fixed in post then I would also opt for a bit of cloning brush work in preference to a crop. The deletion of any chairs would adversely impact on the sense of there being an assembled mutitude! And surely it is the message that is more important than the medium - and it's aspect ratio.
Cheers, _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Thanks for the advice folks. Quite correct too, it would look better with the distraction gone.
My biggest problem at te time were those pesky, ugly, ibis scroungers which kept jumping on the tables. The waiters would come around and spray them from a spray bottle then wipe down the table. It was a matter of getting in a shot between birds ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Thanks Ss, I had cropped it a little already to get rid of some distractions but, like you said and more and starts to lose it's purpose. Shouldn't have been so lazy and just hit the clone button ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
This is a very nice image Siderr, and I also concur with the comments by Alpha and Shooter. It does however work very well.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|