Green plants and patterns

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Green plants and patterns

Postby rokkstar on Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:37 am

Went to the botanical gardens with Taro the other day and decided to go into the greenhouses in the 40 degree heat.
Decided to try a series of backlit shots of leaves. Would appreciate critique and comment. It's the only way I'll learn.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Cheers
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:46 am

Hey Matt, I questioned Taro's thinking of going out on such a hot day, but some of these were well worth the effort.

#1 Great love the lighting, texture and patterns

#2 Isn't so strong for me.. the imperfections don't really interest me, but the detail in the veins is impressive... (the horizon isn't straight 8) )

#3 I like the concept of this a lot.. the light and dark.. but I think it doesn't quiet nail it

#4 This is very very cool.. not only do you have the lovely lines of the palm frond but then you have the very seratted (sp?) edge to the shadow... Brillian!

#5 I like this one but found the 'hairy bit' on the left corner a little distracting (but great pick on such fine detail). I think this shot seems pretty well exposed considering the bright background and the shadowy foreground.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby stubbsy on Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:39 pm

Matt

Thanks for sharing these.

#1 - excellent, would be just a notch better with no shadow top left IMHO

#2 - doesn't work for me for a number of reasons. Biggest for me is the diagonal line created by the centre of the leaf which breaks the image oddly. Probably breaks one of those "immutable" laws of composition too :wink: I also find the brown rust marks distracting. The real shot here for me would be a eggstream close up of the centre where you can actually see the cellular structure. 8)

#3 - whereas the line leads my eye out of the shot in #2 it has the opposite effect. This is my pick of these. The image is made stronger by the impact of the dhadows since they have a clearly defined shape (as opposed to #1 where the shadow is a blurry distraction)

#4 - Anothe rexcellent use of light and dhade, just behind #3 in my view.

#5 - doesn't work for me. The high key lighting in the background distracts me too much from an examination of the interesting symmetry of the leaf structure.

Edit: I'd like to see a B & W of #5
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Killakoala on Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:54 pm

I quite like all of them in their own way. The use of pattern and form is well defined and pleasing to the eye. Your composition and the back-lighting is excellent.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby blinkblink on Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:27 pm

I like'em all. The shadow on number 4 is great.

Chris
User avatar
blinkblink
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Romsey, Victoria

Postby rokkstar on Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:01 pm

Thanks for your comments people.
I tried my hand at some macro before these but they didnt work out too well so switched to this idea.
Peter, I tried a B&W with #5 but it didn't turn out right. Might revist it though.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques