Two Monochromatic Portraits

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Two Monochromatic Portraits

Postby Nnnnsic on Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:21 am

Title says it all... first one is my brother, second is one of my aunts.

Image

Image
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Steffen on Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:45 am

Thanks for posting these, really. I cannot make head and tails of the first one *yet*, that Virgin logo seems to grab the eye, no matter where I look. The second one is quite sublime IMHO. It has an intensity and integrity you don't even feel like looking for technical flaws. Isn't that what photography should be about?

I just add this to my long series of humbling experiences...

Kudos,
Steffen
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Sheetshooter on Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:29 am

Nnnnsic,

A male Stark without a beard - that IS stark.

Bad attempts at humour aside - both of these are very compelling portraits in their own way and each for reasons quite particular to themselves. The sibling shot works at several levels and at most of these I find the Virgin logo quite indispensible. The tonality and the 'colour' of the brother portrait sets it in a time warp that could be just yesterday or the 1930s. The picture is timeless and yet it is also a time capsule - a hint of a lamp of one era, a chair and upholstery of another and yet informed by yet another, and the slither of a TV of today.

Leigh, this is one of the best pictures I have seen from you and I applaud you for it. Not that that is to detract from your other stuff - this is just different and 'your' presence is more subtle - more invisible.

Now, Aunty!! This is a cracker also. I love photos that pose questions but offer no answers and this image is abundant in questions and devoid of a resolution for any of them. Is aunty pensive? Grievous? Bitter? In disbelief? Her expression telegraphs all of these qualities that she might be experiencing from the letter she is reading and it also reveals none of them. The chin and the lips along with the gesture of the hands indicate that hunky-dory-ness is possibly pretty thin on the ground. The flower appears to have seen better days and she is surrounded by comforting fragments of her life: the books she has enjoyed, the family pictures that reassure her of 'belonging' and the gentle and seemingly short-term disarray of the desk-top. Has her day been interrupted? Or ios she fed up with household chores and simply taking a well-earned rest?

But the element that most indicates to me that Aunty could do with some consolation or empathy right now is the steadfast, stoic and reassuring glance of the person in the portrait on the wall. For me THAT is a potent and defining element in this very intriguing narrative of yours.

Thanks for posting them - they've given, me something to ponder over breakfast.
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt

Postby Geoff on Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:48 am

Leigh there is something about the first image that I really like, yet I'm not sure what it is. Maybe it's the 'tonal qualities' that have been explored I'm just not sure.

So..another Stark...another Virgin? :D :D
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques