



A Woman's WorkModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A Woman's Work![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Leigh,
For me (and who the hell am I?) this is not as powerful as a sequence as the second shot which distills the essence of what the post title indicates you are conveying is as a stand-alone image. Cinematic sequencing of still pictures is something I have often done and it is a wonderful communication and entertainment device but is it adding or detracting from the potency of shot number 2? It is YOUR statement only YOU can answer that. So, what is it with number 2 then? Well, I think that the information OUTSIDE the filter is in ideal correlation with the information INSIDE the filter. Each is informed and reinforced by the other. And the level of detail in the tonality is bloody perfect. The toil laden woman is seen with just sufficient separation of the low-values to prevent her from becoming the predictable and denying silhouette and the brightness of the clean and tidy house is right on the edge but is as clean as a whistle. The crowning achievement is the inclusion of the reflection on the near side of the filter. Deliberate or accidental doesn't matter. It is well worthy of exploitation and further experimentation. _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
I agree with Walter.
#2 has "it" in droves, for me, and tells the whole story in one image. Very refreshing image (but probably not terribly PC ![]() TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: A Woman's WorkThis one is very good, Leigh. I like it a great deal.
![]()
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Hi Leigh, in contrast to the others I like 3, the slighly more hunched over central figure more clearly conveys the burden of the work to me, notwithstanding the secondary figure is slightly more distracting. Innovative series, thanks for sharing.
For me #4. There is something Dickensian about a woman seated at a table laden with food and no one else there
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|