


Brisbane sunset

A taste of urbaness
Urbaness sunset BrisbaneModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Urbaness sunset BrisbaneThese are my first image postings, so take it easy on me please.
![]() ![]() ![]() Brisbane sunset ![]() A taste of urbaness
Your first image doesn't do a lot for me, but I like the second. Colours and exposure are really good, however I am not sure about the horizontal rails. It would be good if you could clone them out.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
The first image is weakened by an empty foreground. IE Nothing but water. Usually a good idea to avoid doing that.
The second image has a lovely mood about it and I would love to take a model there for a shoot. Thanks for posting. Regards
Matt. K
I have to agree that the first shot is a little weak.. not much happening and the I feel to far away from the some-what interesting bits..
#2 Now this is much better, nicely exposed... love the spider webs and the 'urban decay', great sense of atmoshphere... and I agree... find a pretty girl (or guy) and bring her back here for a photo shoot ![]()
I likewise agree witht eh comments above but will add.
#1 - Does have a repeating pattern in it (the lights on the bridge) and the bridge being a leading line (to where?) but lacks in appeal. A play with colours in Photoshop could enhance the image somewhat as could some severe cropping, ala panorama. #2 - I like this image. The rail adds to the urbanity of the image. The graffiti and the old peeling paint emphasises it further. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Second one great.
First one lacks something to catch your fancy, plus it appears out of focus? Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes. http://www.dionm.net/
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|