This is Nigella (Love in the mist), but I think Medusa is a better title. 1/250 sec, f13, tripod.

Cheers, John
MedusaModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
MedusaThis macro thing is more difficult than it looks. This is one of the shots that I think works. I did a whole lot of bee chasing in my garden, but the images were pretty terrible. Mostly out of focus, or out of the frame all together. I need a lot of practise. Good thing films so cheap.
This is Nigella (Love in the mist), but I think Medusa is a better title. 1/250 sec, f13, tripod. ![]() Cheers, John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Those bloody bees are hard tackers to catch huh... Took me heaps of goes to get one in focus...
![]() This looks great, good color and looks sharp too... Unusual flower construction... Macro lens or filter? Aka Andrew
Nice shot I would have cut the branch in the foreground off ( Always carry a Swiss army knife with scissors etc) I have been known to remove branches to get a better shot.
If you want bugs catch them and cool them in the fridge than just add them where you want them. I know one photographer who breeds pretty little bugs just to put on flowers. "All is fair in love, war and photography"
- second the motion. Otherwise a damn fine shot.
- just not for *too* long - I left a bumblebee in the fridge for a coupla hours by mistake - it took 20 minutes for him to thaw enough to not look totally dead, and a minute or two after that he flew off. Made for a very tight working timeframe. I'm told another alternative is to dip the subject plant matter in a solution of honey and water. Not sure whether it's meant to glue the bugs in place, or just attract them for a free feed. K
Thanks for the comments.
Andrew, it's my new Sigma 150 2.8macro. I'm having a lot of fun learning how to use it. Cheers, John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
mmm, nice... Looks like you can get good deep DOF with a dedicated macro lens, as opposed to a filter ![]() Aka Andrew
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|