1/500s @ f/11 with SB800 fill in.


CrittersModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
CrittersWent for a wander with the extensions tubes and 70-300 Tamron Macro. Had all 3 extension tubes when I found the dragonfly so could not fit much in but I thought the wing pattern and the way teh wings attach was pretty amazing.
1/500s @ f/11 with SB800 fill in. ![]() ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
These are both great but that first one really catches me... Good detail, find macro stuff harder than it looks, I would have had trouble getting focus right with that little DOF, takes me heaps to get one right
![]() Aka Andrew
Thanks Andrew, I would have like a bit more DOF to get the eyes in focus too. Trouble with dragonflys is they don't give you a lot of time to experiment. ![]()
Thanks Steve, I had all three tubes on which is 60mm extension in total with the lens at 300mm. With this set up I was about 80 to 90cm away (guesstimate). Biggest problem is keeping teh whole thing stable. It really needs some sort of mount on the lens because with the tubes on there is a fair bit sticking out the front of the camera. ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
I kinda figured that it might be fairly long.
With long primes or even zooms, the tripod mounts around the centre of gravity but with tubes etc, most of the weight will still be on the camera so that would cause grief if you tried mounting the tripod anywhere elso. I imagine stuff like wind etc would look like an earthquake in the viewfinder. something for me to look forward to! Steve
The Dragonfly was handheld as I was chasing the thing around for a couple of minutes waiting for a moment, but the hoppers were not moving much at all so I set up on the tripod. There was a slight breeze and they were moving back and forth by a few centimetres. Just had to wait for them to reach the top of the swing before they sprung back again. To give you an idea of scale they were only about 1.5cm long. Fun and games ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Nice sharp images Mark. I agree the pattern of the wing joins on the dragonfly are incredible. Have been tossing up whether to try for stepdown rings to fit the Canon 500D closeup lens to my 62mm 35-70F/2.8 AF-D or get the extension tubes. What sort are you using - Kenko? and what functions do you lose once in place?
cheers marco
HI Marco, they are "Glanz Triplus". Got them from Photocontinental for $178.00 (on a sale day RRP $198.00). The Kenko were $228.00 (I think) and I could not see any difference. At the end of it all there is no lens quality to worry about. Don't lose any functions as they are fully compatible with all the auto functions focus, aperture etc. but manual focus is the way to go with the lenses I have as the A/F is a little slow. ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Mark love the Dragon fly... I like the fact the shot i a little unexpected as it fills so much of the frame, and I think the DOF works well in this shot to draw attention to the detail in their wings (which are incredible when you stop and think about them).
The hopper is nicely done as well, but for me the dragon is definitely my favourite (and handheld!) nicely done!
Mark,
I love your new signature line. A welcome bit of cheer. All honour and glory be unto thee also for being able to hand hold a rig like that so effectively. Quite inspiring! Cheers, _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Thanks Craig. At the time I would have liked to get more in the shot but it is a bit hard to whip off a couple of extension tubes while the Dragonfly sits and waits. In hindsight though I am really happy how it turned out. I cloned out the little bits of spider web across the wing (I think it was spider web) and printed it out A4 this morning. I think it's heading for a frame and the wall. The blue colour came up a treat ![]() I think I'll be out the back later looking for more ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Thanks Walter. It can be a bit of a handfull. Here is a shot of the whole shebang in all it's glory. The monster tripod has since been replaced with a neat Manfrotto number ![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Oh my Gosh, thats bloody big. Dude I tip my hat to you, having not seen a full assembled extension tubes + 70-300, that's massive!!! I guess the one good thing is the extension tubes have no additional glass so can't weigh as much it looks but still, it must be no easy feat tracking fast moving tiny insects with that number!!
I'm still shaking my head...
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|