Introducing the family

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Introducing the family

Postby rokkstar on Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:42 am

Took some pictures of the Mother-in-law and Sister-in-law over the festive period. Would appreciate C&C on the outcome.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Cheers
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Onyx on Mon Jan 02, 2006 12:15 pm

What happened to colour? It's like intended to be artisitically faded/desaturated but it's not quite all the way there (ie. B&W). If you stuck some grain in, it would have that aged scanned slide look. At the moment it's like half way to nowhere, with contrast muddy in the shadows. A little too much depth of field for the lighting style - I think you could try a larger aperture.

Sorry if I come across as overly negative Matt. These are top shots, but from the past work you've posted on these forums (self portraits), I actually prefer those to these. A good variety of poses though, but I don't know if the composition was intentional (chopped off arms, etc)
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby marcotrov on Mon Jan 02, 2006 12:16 pm

I like #1 and #5 Matt. #1 for the graduating lighting effect It really focuses the viewer on the subjects face. #2 good too but the pose facial expression is natural but the arm needs dodging, particularly the arm pit which takes too much attention away from the face. Perhaps a little more of the effect you achieved in #1 but fading from face of subject to the elbow and armpit area adding more contrast. #5 (last) is jut plain cute and well lit. Great expression. Nice images.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby birddog114 on Mon Jan 02, 2006 12:20 pm

Matt,
They're nice, I like all your photos.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby ozczecho on Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:15 pm

Nice series Matt. My Fave would be the last one. She has a great look/pose - looks very natural. If I had to be critical, i'd like to see a tad more light on her right side of her face.

Well done.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:25 pm

I like them Matt - the last one is cheeky :) and the first one is harsh and unflattering but works :)
Well done
Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Alex on Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:27 pm

Matt,

Nice series. I like the last one and no. 2.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Geoff on Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:27 am

matt - sharp as a tac and posed beautifully. I like all of them and don't think that the (? lack) of light on their faces is detrimental to the outcome....it has some artistic merit and shows a style to your shooting ways...well done, keep it up! :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:31 pm

I think the ones of your sister-in-law are the strongest here, with numbers 2, 4 and 5 being the best.

You know, one day we're going to get you to shoot in front of a black background! :lol:
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby stubbsy on Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:57 pm

Matt

It's taken me quite a while and several revisits of the images to comment on these.

#1 - my first reaction was along the lines of "I sure hope she doesn't see this shot" since it is so unflattering, yet the shot appeals because it has a certain honesty to it. My only real complaint is the blown highlight on your MIL's cheekbone (but note that I obsess about blown highlights :wink: )

#2 - This is a really beautiful, natural shot. Having tried to take pics of your sister in law at the Christmas dinner and encountered her reticence I am in awe of this result. She is very photogenic and this is a great example. I really like the composition and the lighting, but would have preferred to see both arms.

#3 - The weakest. While she is photogenic I'd avoid profile shots.

#4 - Great composition again. I like the pensive nature here and the lighting brings this out really well. Was this pose a request from you?

#5 - Best of the lot - I like the cheekiness of this and the white top works well. I'd like a touch more light on the right cheek to bring back some detail there, but that's minor.

For me the desat works on these too, although the last one I'd like to see a high sat version too.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby rokkstar on Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:27 pm

Thanks for the comments here people.

I realise that #1 is unflattering but I think that's why I like it - because it is so honest. I haven't PP'd her skin or anything, left it warts and all. This is one of my pictures that I am really happy with and I can;t really explain why. The blown cheekbone is annoying. I'd like to do a series of intimate honest portraits like this. I'm going to ask for some forum volunteers very soon I think, and hire out some studio space.

With the sister in law, she was very reticent to pose for me. I had to direct her completely, going so far as to position her arms and turn her etc which made it all the more difficult. I couldn't understand why she couldn't interpret what I wanted and act on it, and found myself doing the poses in front of her trying to get her to copy. It definately helped me learn a thing or two about how models might feel and encountering difficult ones.

Chi, the images have been desaturated by 50%. I like the way it looks. I don't know why, but I don't want them B&W and I don't want them full colour. At the stage I'm at at the moment I'm drawn to this colouring. Don't worry about appearing negative, I don't mind at all - it's all good feedback mate.

I haven't tried a black background yet Leigh, but it's on my list.

Thanks again for your comments people, all greatly appreciated.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:31 pm

I disagree with Chi and I think that this lessened-colour style is your sort of thing.

It may be that you're not a black and white processor yet or it may be that you've found a sort of processing that works for you.

Either way, it looks good.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby xerubus on Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:06 pm

I like these shots... the desaturation of colours works well for me. Here's some comments which I have drawn from straws.

#1: I like the honesty in this shot. Only distraction for me is the harsh highlights on the cheek bones.

#2, 3, & 4: Tad bit more contrast.

#5: This is the winner for me. You can see a bit of her personality in the shot. Again, maybe the highlights on the cheek bones are a bit too harsh.
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby DionM on Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:24 pm

Really like this series - what was the lighting setup etc?

First and last really do it for me - I feel I can see some of the personality's through them - first one is a "go away" but still playing along kind of feel.

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques