Thought I would try something different from Mrs Macquires Chair this evening.
Which do you prefer?
Pic 1

Pic 2

Thanks,
Bill
Our Coat hangerModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Our Coat hangerHi All,
Thought I would try something different from Mrs Macquires Chair this evening. Which do you prefer? Pic 1 ![]() Pic 2 ![]() Thanks, Bill
First one for me too Bill. I would have had to think about it had the #2 image foreground interest been a tall ship in the evening glow
![]() cheers marco Last edited by marcotrov on Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
The second one is interesting, but the first one is probably the better of the two.
Nice work. ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
I'll be different and go #2.
Your main subject in both images only fills a small portion of the frame and there is nothing truly dynamic in the subject itself. For this reason, the rest of the frame needs to hold some information for the viewer or they will quickly lose interest in the image. #1 The large expanse of sky is too plain and has no detail to keep me fixed on it . A quick glance at the bridge and the opera house and I'm done! bye bye #2 Suddenly, we have 3 elements to the image. Main subject, sky above with clouds to give some detail and foreground info to finish things off. Maybe the foreground info could have been lit a little better or had some better elements but on a whole, I think this image will keep a viewers attention longer and is overall the better shot. After the other recent thread, bare/bear in mind it's only my opinion! ![]() Edit: Best option would be to crop square on #1 but I know this is unheard of these days! ![]() Mark
Great lighting.
I prefer #1 - the sky is much more interesting than the foreground (rock, monument, railing) in #2. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
I'll have to go number one for clarity and colour.... however, if the second shot had something more interesting in the foreground i'd say that it would win hands down...
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Definitely #1. Nice use of negative space, and also a touch of the "can also be broken" rule of thirds. Excellent lighting and all in all a good image.
If the second image had a small boy standing on the rock looking over the harbour, then that would have been a better image. But as you cannot go around the city purloining small boys (well, not without getting arrested), you did well with what you had to work with! Cheers Sheila Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur On-line Gallery here
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|