The girl with the black umbrella

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The girl with the black umbrella

Postby Sheila Smart on Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

I took this shot with my Canon 135 f/2 of a young woman and her dog (partner out of frame) at Narrabeen. I converted the image using an "impressionist" filter. It was one of my first attempts at using the filter and I really have not got the hang of it :D


Image

I like this image but ... and there's always a but .. the shot I missed (while "chimping") was about five seconds later when the boyfriend came up to her and bent over to kiss her. That's the shot I missed :x

Still, life's like that - full of missed opportunities!
Cheers
Sheila
Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls
Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur
On-line Gallery here
Sheila Smart
Member
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Avalon Beach, NSW

Postby pippin88 on Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:51 am

Sheila, the filter doesn't do much for me (filters rarely do), but I'd like to see the original, as it looks to be a great image.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby xerubus on Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:53 am

I don't usually go for paint/cartoon/etc filters... but this one works very nicely with the image. I like this a lot, and if I took the shot i'd have it on my wall. Do you mind sharing where the filter is from?

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby myarhidia on Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:56 am

Don't like the filter at all. As pippin suggested, post the original as it looks like a great image.

Chimping is one way to miss opportunities, the other is when shooting RAW & waiting for the buffer to clear :evil:
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
User avatar
myarhidia
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney, So where the bloody hell are you?

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:56 am

This is a superb image - notice I do not say photograph!

The application of this filter has created an entirely new and appealing feel to a photo, hence my calling it an image.

My only comment other than being very positive, is to remove the distracting dark blobs in the sand.

Excellent use of a filter. :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby stubbsy on Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:05 am

Sheila

I like the image, but not the filter. I think your concept is right, but the execution is lacking. Photoshop filters are a real challenge. I recently wanted to turn a flower shot into what looked like an impressionist painting. I spent about 10 times longer doing that than I did on the rest of the PP. While I was ultimately happy with what I got (image is here for the curious) I'm not convinced it was worth the effort. That said I'd encourage you to revisit this since you are heading in the right direction. The reason it doesn't work for me is there is too regular a pattern overlaying the image and it's a very obvious pattern.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:08 am

I love the image, and the while I haven't mastered or even attempted filters this really reminds me of a few Australian artists...

It's almost like the camera and computer turn you into a painter (which is kind of cool).

Really like this, the pose, the colours, its lovely I would be interested on seeing the original, but I think this is fine piece of art.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Sheila Smart on Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:22 am

Here's the original

Image

One thing I neglected to do was to clone out the reflection in the sand of her boyfriend who did not add to the image :D

The "impressionist" filter was sent to me by a wonderfully eccentric American (Neovolatile) on PBase. If anyone is interested, just email me and I will send you the filter. Its 5MB so you need broadband and a server which accepts this size. But don't ask me how to use it. Its all hit and miss really but can be a great deal of fun! It was originally a Microsoft download but is no longer available apparently.

Cheers
Sheila
Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls
Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur
On-line Gallery here
Sheila Smart
Member
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Avalon Beach, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:24 am

Sheila - the filter version has turned your original photo into a masterpiece image (with blobs removed :wink: )
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby stubbsy on Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:28 am

Sheila

Looking at the original I'm even more convinced you're on a winner with this. The filtered version (despite my "dislike") is much more effective than the original. As is often the case this demonstrates the credo of go with your instincts.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Matt. K on Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:33 am

Sheila
I think the image has further potential and whilst your first attempt got close I think Peter hit it on the head with his observation that the uniform pattern through the image weakened it.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby myarhidia on Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:36 am

I liked the colours of the filtered version but not the filter itself. In comparison, the original looks a bit flat to me. :(
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
User avatar
myarhidia
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney, So where the bloody hell are you?

Postby Killakoala on Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:58 pm

I love it, it's brilliant. It's just what i like.

The sand looks like it has been turned into varnished wood and the rest painted on.

It's a filter i would play with.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Alex on Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:28 pm

I can only see a red cross :-(

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alex on Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:59 pm

Excellent image, Sheila. I prefer the original.
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby blacknstormy on Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:27 pm

Sheila - I love the effect which has been beautifully done!! - to me, it has brought an 'all-right' photo to life ! If the offer is still on, I'll be emailing you shortly to beg for the filter :)
Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby moggy on Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:50 pm

Nice image Sheila, works for me. :wink:

8) Bob.

.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby Steffen on Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:12 am

I do like the impressionist version. I think, though, that the colour of the water, which looks pefectly natural in the original shot, doesn't quite work with the painting. It looks like burnt down ashes and makes the whole image look a bit like fire/heat/volcano. Maybe you could go totally impressionist and tint the water a bit more blueish? It would go well with the ocker of the sand, too. And it would restore the beach mood for me. Just my humble opinion...

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Poon on Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:32 am

Shaila,
Like an antique French oil painting in 18th century.
Well done.
-------------
Regards
Poon
User avatar
Poon
The HK Connection
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Collingwood on Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:26 am

Is the original now in it's "final" state? ie you have finished PP it?
Just curious.
Mark
User avatar
Collingwood
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:55 am
Location: Melbourne SE


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques