
Comments on this please My first B&W so be brutally honest ...not

My first B&WModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
My first B&W![]() Comments on this please My first B&W so be brutally honest ...not ![]()
IMO the B+W works well! there is good / interesting shadow / light about the face.
the background does nothing (esp in B+W), perhaps a closer crop around the face?
i think the black and white conversion works well.. but it seems to be lacking a bit of punch... perhaps a little flat? add a bit of contrast to try and get the shot to pop. just my thoughts.
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
as a suggestion half of what makes a good contrasty photograph is the search for good light, if the light is not near ideal doesn't matter ewhat you do with the camera you will get a flat image, if you like a more contrasty search for good light, position your subject where the light works off the subject best and then take the shot, don't be afraid to experiment it's the only way to learn.
Now that said if you like a muted look, the image works fine as it's shot of the way things were, the image is true to itself. As one of my rules i am always in search for good light if i find it i shoot whatever is in the vacinity of it.
Stephen
the DOF is nice however, I find the bright sky to be distracting. The contrast is also lacking (as mentioned earlier). Try adding another +15 to 20 on the contrast and see what you think. You lose a bit of detail from the trees in the background, however you could always mask out the background and only boost the contrast to your subject. Also, did you adjust your "levels" prior to converting to B&W ? That may also help a little ![]() Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Nice image, but it does seem flat.
Play with the curves and contrast a bit. ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Thanks guys i will go back and have a play as you have suggested.I did not reallly alter anything in pp (curves ,contrast) as im still learning all that but i think the sky being a little blown is distracting and i will maybe try a closer crop.Thankyou for the CC
Stephen
Hey Stephen - I like the second image - has picked up and is not as flat
![]() Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|