Something fisheye! (D/U Warning)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Something fisheye! (D/U Warning)

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:28 pm

Yes more pics taken at Phuoc Hue Temple at Lunar New Year . These ones were all taken with the Nikkor 10.5/2.8 DX fisheye lens. Especially for Craig :wink:

Defish (of varying degrees) has been done using DxO Optics Pro. While not an everyday use lens, this is a fun lens to play with. To see a larger version, click a pic.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:42 pm

Thanks Peter! Hehe, it was well worth the wait, I can't wait to have a play with one of these lens... but on second thoughts the lust will only increase so maybe I should.

I love the first one and the large gong/bell, I've been wondering if the fisheye would make interesting fireworks shots, but from what I could tell you had the 24-120VR on for the fireworks. (is that right?)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:45 pm

Craig - #1 and #4 are the standouts for me. Interestingly one makes heavy use of the distortion, the other not so.

You are correct. All my fireworks pics were taken with 24-120 VR. Too much happening to change lenses since the lion dance and fireworks were pretty much straight on top of each other.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Something fisheye! (D/U Warning)

Postby Steffen on Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:58 pm

stubbsy wrote:While not an everyday use lens, this is a fun lens to play with.


Your images are living proof that this is a very versatile lens, nevertheless. Please keep them coming, I love them all!

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby stubbsy on Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:32 pm

Thanks Steffen. I'm more than happy with the purchase since I'm getting some great stuff from it.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Mal on Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:04 pm

Bugger, smugmug is doing their service again..... I'll be back....
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby big pix on Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:25 pm

.......I'll be back.....
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby xerubus on Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:15 pm

tag.... be back when smug has finished it's thing...
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby Mal on Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:31 pm

Mal wrote:Bugger, smugmug is doing their service again..... I'll be back....

Back...
Number one looks like a grinning building :)
I love this lens and I think you have go t some great shots here with it.
Well done.
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby nito on Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:51 pm

My favourite is no. 5 with the gong! That shot is amazing.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby Onyx on Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:52 pm

Peter, great symmetrical composition and just the right amount of perspective correction - but the indoors lighting seems to be a bit flat and unexciting. Don't get me wrong - they're perfectly exposed, but being so 'perfect', the lighting appears a bit bland IMO.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby stubbsy on Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:35 pm

Mal - Thanks - Hadn't thought about it, but you're right about #1. And I love this lens too :D
Nghia - Thanks. I've been to the temple a few times, but never been able to get wide enough to do the bell justice until now
Chi - Thanks. The indoor shots were very challenging. As you'd know, all but the top (seventh) level of the building have the statues directly in front of a window and the light from there is very bright during the day. These were mostly taken with a flash to try and balance the light and flash has a tendency to dull down the pics. Something I then worked on getting back in PP.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:43 pm

I'm with Stubbsy on this one, first one and last one works great with the FE. The other pics for some reason make me sick...not because they're poor quality or anything, just the distortion doesn't sit right :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques