Taken at Banyule Flats last November in the first week of acquiring my 500MM lens.
D70, 500AFSII, 1.4X, SB800 + BB, G1325 + Wimberley
ISO 400, 700MM, 1/160, F/10, Aperture Priority, Matrix, Flash EV -3.0 (oops).

Eastern Yellow RobinModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Eastern Yellow RobinNot sure if this is too dark as my monitor isn't calibrated, have others said it's too dark on another forum and reposted with what appears about 10-15% brightness increase.
Taken at Banyule Flats last November in the first week of acquiring my 500MM lens. D70, 500AFSII, 1.4X, SB800 + BB, G1325 + Wimberley ISO 400, 700MM, 1/160, F/10, Aperture Priority, Matrix, Flash EV -3.0 (oops). ![]() Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Great photo Darryl,
you really make that lens sing ![]() I'm not on the best of monitors here, but looks fine to me. cheers, Andre Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Gorgeous Darryl and the exposure looks fine on my LCD. Nice and sharp too. Is this a crop ? or the full frame ?
Absolutely Brilliant!!!
Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
Fantastic Darryl, looks perfect from here.
![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Wow, that really pops! I run a dual monitor setup, with one each LCD and CRT. Looks great on both!
The only thing extra I'd ask for, and this is being really picky, is a touch more depth of field to get the feet in focus as well. As it is they're close, but not quite in. Definitely framing and hanging on the lounge room wall material! Dopeler Effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
It's about 75-80% of fullframe so not much of a crop. Still a lot of pixels on the original, around 2400px on the longest side. As for the DOF, I'm struggling to get a decent amount of DOF with this lens and as you see I was running 1/160 and F10, ISO400 which is my own personal preference as a maximum to eliminate noise too much noise. This was pretty much on minimum focus, and this lens has bugger all DOF at min focus even if you do adjust the aperture. From what I've heard the DOF is around about an inch at min focus
![]() Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
At 5 metres, F10 on a d70 the DOF is only 3.63 cm... and that isn't including the 1.4x TC (not sure how that effects it)
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
From what I can gather if I went from F/10 to F/16 or F/20 I'd get 5-6cm of DOF to play with. Which I'm not quite sure if it'd get much more of the bird in focus, I definately didn't have the light to do that either.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
Darryl
This is a fine image regardless of any discussion about DOF. If I had an image of this calibre I'd be proud as punch. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
As I said, I was being really picky. Glad I was though - that's a very interesting URL! Found a reference to a 1200 - 1700mm lens the other day (here), so I plugged in 1200mm as focal length. Depth of field at 10 metres? 2cm. At 3m? zero...
![]() Back on topic, that is a seriously good pic Darryl. Wish it was mine. Would have been very hard to get a bird like that to stay still long enough to capture it. Dopeler Effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
the composition is beautiful and DOF is good as you are at realy long focal length.yeh its little dark but looks good on my monitor.since cuz of yellowish color and cast it have a little dull feel.a little exposure jump can fix it if you have took in RAW.
Pall.A.
Cool bird pic!
![]() TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Beautifully sharp image and lovely bokeh. Well done.
Cheers Sheila Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur On-line Gallery here
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|