I'm not quite sure if this pano works and if I want to keep it. 18 portrait mode shots stitched with PanoFactory 3.3. Manual focus, manual exposure, f/9, 1/80. 82 mm at 24-120VR.
Anyway, for your C&C:

Ernest Hill PanoModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Ernest Hill PanoHi,
I'm not quite sure if this pano works and if I want to keep it. 18 portrait mode shots stitched with PanoFactory 3.3. Manual focus, manual exposure, f/9, 1/80. 82 mm at 24-120VR. Anyway, for your C&C: ![]() Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
Mikhail - I like this pano - the eye being drawn off to the left, taking the vines to infinity, works for me
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Mikhail
This is definitely a keeper. I agree with Chris. It captures the wonderful lines the eye sees in vistas like this. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I think the pano is good as Chris said it draws the eye to the left, so in my book it's affective.
Not wanting to exacerbate the issue of posting panos, but if you post a 800x wide version and then a link to a larger version it wouldn't managle the forum pages causing the text to scroll extra wide ![]()
Agree on the 800 wide point, but you already knew that
![]() On the pano itself, I'd think that if it's as clear as it looks at this size, Ernest Hill would love to get a large copy of it! Would look really nice on their wall ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Thanks guys! Now I definetely see it's a keeper
![]() Accordingly to size ... with my 1920x1200 resolution I didn't even think about 1280 pixels wide picture problem ![]() Next time I'll do what you recommend! Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
Nice choice of subject for the pano, exposures seem nicely matched, definately worth keeping... Maybe worth a soft gradient down from the top to bring out the textures in the sky maybe? The brightness of the sky seems a bit strong for me...
Reckon the vineyard may be interested in a print of that... Aka Andrew
Thank you, Andrew!
You aren't first who says that vineyard might be interested .... Maybe I really have to try to contact them .... Anyway, appreciate all your advices, guys! Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|