Bronte Morning

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Bronte Morning

Postby Sandy Feet on Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:31 pm

Here are a couple for critique, taken early Saturday Morning at Bronte Beach

Cheers
Rod

Image


Image
User avatar
Sandy Feet
Member
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Cooroibah, Sunshine Coast, QLD

Postby NikonUser on Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:50 pm

Very nice!

It looks like the houses in the first shot are sorta just piled haphazardly ontop of each other. The colours look cartoonish.

I'd probably like to see it straightened up a little (rotated to the left)

Second one is georgeous!

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**

Postby Willigan on Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:54 pm

The water in the first one is great - I'd maybe crop some of the sky out & give the rocks & water more impact & clone out the little red thingy in the middle.

The sunrise is gorgeous.
Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
User avatar
Willigan
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Canberra

Postby mitedo on Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:55 pm

Both shots are great just the frames are a little to large for me
Kevin
User avatar
mitedo
Member
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Noosaville .

Postby gstark on Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:04 pm

Paul,

I think that that's about as straight as you can get Bronte to look. It almost looks European, with the "boxes" all piled up like that.

But I'm puzzled: where's Charlotte?

Rod, great shooting.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Frankenstein on Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:26 pm

Rod, two great images. I'd also crop half the sky from the first one, but regardless they are both excellent.

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby Sandy Feet on Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:26 pm

I forgot to clone out the red thingy, which is actually a swimmer.

That is about as straight as the area gets at Bronte

Thanks for the comments Guys

Cheers
Rod
User avatar
Sandy Feet
Member
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Cooroibah, Sunshine Coast, QLD

Postby Catcha on Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:50 pm

Sandy Feet wrote:I forgot to clone out the red thingy, which is actually a swimmer.

That is about as straight as the area gets at Bronte

Thanks for the comments Guys

Cheers
Rod


Nice shots what were your setting for achieve that 1st shot ?
Ben Yu

D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!!

Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
User avatar
Catcha
Senior Member
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:36 am
Location: Darwin, Northern Territory Was the only true open speed limts in Australia

Postby Sandy Feet on Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:48 pm

Does someone know how to get a grab of the EXIF data to save typing it all out

Cheers
Rod
User avatar
Sandy Feet
Member
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Cooroibah, Sunshine Coast, QLD

Postby avkomp on Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:00 pm

2 nice images

I prefer the second and in the pano crop.

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby leek on Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:58 pm

Sandy Feet wrote:Does someone know how to get a grab of the EXIF data to save typing it all out

Cheers
Rod


Yep... Get yourself IExif from opanda.com and you'll be able to cut & paste to your heart's content... Mind you... If other people use IExif, then you wouldn't have to tell them what it was... :lol:

Here's the relevant part of the Exif for your 1st shot:
Exposure Time = 3"
F Number = F11
Exposure Program = Aperture priority
ISO Speed Ratings = 200
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby marcotrov on Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:00 pm

Like both shots, terrific colour composition, but I agree with Kevin re the frames.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Slider on Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:49 pm

Great shots, both. I have to agree that the frames are a bit oversized for the images. :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby Sandy Feet on Tue Feb 14, 2006 6:03 am

Exposure Time = 3"
F Number = F11
Exposure Program = Aperture priority
ISO Speed Ratings = 200
Date Time Original = 2006-02-11 06:03:25
Shutter Speed Value = -1.58 TV
Aperture Value = 6.92 AV
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Max Aperture Value = F3.48
Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage
Flash = Off
Focal Length = 18mm
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 769
Exif Image Height = 1084
Focal Length In 35mm Film = 27mm
User avatar
Sandy Feet
Member
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Cooroibah, Sunshine Coast, QLD


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques