Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by dooda on Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:55 pm
I went to my absolutely favorite place ever last night, caught a couple of pictures, had some fun, relaxed, and even met some other cook who likes to walk through the woods (about 1 kilometer) in the middle of the night to enjoy the moonlight. I find this place really rejuvenating.
Critique and comments are welcome. I'm sort of torn, I really want to go back tonight, but there's another area that's calling my name as well.
THe lighthouse pic was about 3 1/2 minute shutter, the other one was 5 minutes. Both taken with the Sigma 10-20 mm.
Last edited by dooda on Sun Feb 12, 2006 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by leek on Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:10 pm
Nice images Dave...
It's probably distortion caused by the WA lens, but my eye keeps getting attracted to the lighthouse that doesn't appear to be quite vertical.
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by dooda on Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:28 pm
Oops, i should have corrected that. I keep forgetting to since getting this WA. I'll correct it in a little bit. Thanks!
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by Slider on Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:31 pm
Fantastic shots. The 2nd is a beauty 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by Willigan on Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:31 pm
Great shots Dooda. It's a pity about the red streak on the right in the second one - it's a little distracting
Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
-

Willigan
- Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:14 am
- Location: Canberra
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:33 pm
Lovely stuff Dooda! As usual your night time shots are inspiring and relaxing to view!
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by NikonUser on Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:37 pm
Very nice.
I love the first one. The detail in the rock in the foreground and also on the rocks that the lighthouse is sat in is great.
Colours are really nice too.
Must be quite a solid setup you have to get them that sharp at 3.5 mins!!
Paul
-

NikonUser
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
- Location: Canberra - **D2X**
-
by dooda on Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:41 pm
Willigan, I could have cloned the red streak, but I like it too much. It's at a dynamic angle, and the sweep of the stars sort of leads me to that direction. Also, it's not that strong, so for me it doesn't pull me away, (unlike direct light which is my nemesis).
I'd be interested in hearing what anyone else thinks about the red reflection.
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by NikonUser on Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:45 pm
My choice would be to clone out the red reflection.
-

NikonUser
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
- Location: Canberra - **D2X**
-
by dooda on Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:05 pm
Heh, my setup consists of a $95 slik. Really light weight so I can hike long distances and not worry about it. Easy to stow along. I recently added a Velbon ballhead so I could get my shots level.
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by ABG on Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:07 pm
Lovely images Dave - the first one being my favourite. I quite like the red reflection and wouldn't clone it out personally.
Andrew
-

ABG
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: Oatley, Sydney
-
by PiroStitch on Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:26 pm
Dooda,
Awesome pics! I'm constantly scratching my head over your pics as they just blow me away! The midnight landscapes all look very surreal and alien, like something straight out of a sci-fi movie. Great stuff!
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Bretski on Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:18 am
Mate... that first one gets my vote... what a great shot...

Canon 350D
-
Bretski
- Member
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:10 pm
- Location: Rockhampton
-
by Willigan on Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:31 pm
dooda wrote:Willigan, I could have cloned the red streak, but I like it too much.
Yep. Fair enough  It's just a preference thing - I just thought it was off-putting as it was at an intersecting angle to the star trails.
Craig - Canon 350D, EF-S 18-55, EF 70-300
-

Willigan
- Member
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:14 am
- Location: Canberra
-
by BT*ist on Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:05 pm
The first one is gorgeous. I had no idea you could get such an even amount of light in 3.5mins at night!?
-

BT*ist
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: London, United Kingdom
by huynhie on Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:38 pm
Great shots Dave.
I can't decide which one I like more, both are fantastic.
-

huynhie
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
- Location: Sydney
by dooda on Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:35 am
BT*ist
This is why I shoot so often at night, especially by moonlight, is because the light is MORE even. With the sun glaring everywhere, a perfect exposure is never possible and you have to blend everything in layers. At night, the light is much more even, especially when the moon is out.
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by flipfrog on Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:21 am
dave
how do you decide on your exposure time (shutter) when u shoot in bulb? is it a matter of trial and error?
and out of curiosity , why f6.3 ?
-

flipfrog
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: Vancouver Canada
-
by dooda on Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:36 am
Dee,
I tend to do a couple of pictures at ISO 1600 with NR turned off. This gives me a base for exposure times, and all the rest of the shutter times will be around it. When I move it back down to ISO 200, I simply multiply the shutter speed by 8.
I can't remeber why 6.3. There was probably a good reason, but probably not a great one. It depends how long I think I can stand waiting, and how big an effect I think it will have on the picture.
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by flipfrog on Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:19 pm
so your test shots are made in program mode at iso 1600, right?
-

flipfrog
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: Vancouver Canada
-
by Onyx on Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:49 pm
Dave, you should place yourself in these landscape images. Just sit yourself infront of the lens after you trip the shutter. For that "I was here" type shot.  They're gorgeous breathtaking scenes.
-

Onyx
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
- Location: westsyd.nsw.au
-
by dooda on Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:21 pm
Their you go Onyx. I actually throw myself in there every so often for fun. I've thought about going back and having a small candle lit on the rocks, lighting up my face a little bit.
Dee, no I always shoot in manual. I'll set the apeture I want, then go ten seconds or so depending on how much light there is. Make sure I get it right at 1600 and then go down to 200, multiply shutter by 8, turn on NR
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|