Thanks to Matt K for suggesting I take a shot of this location. Click a pic for a larger version.



Chair VariationsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Chair VariationsThree different compositions taken from roughly the same spot using the 10.5 DX Nikkor fisheye lens and changing where the centre of the lens was positioned. The pics were taken at Hunter Valley Gardens during the recent Vintage weekend outing and none have had the fisheye effect reduced during PP
Thanks to Matt K for suggesting I take a shot of this location. Click a pic for a larger version. ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by stubbsy on Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
the whacky perspective on the first is more interestign but the 2nd looks more right, not sure if you wanted to get the roof bit in the 2nd shot
your camera must be getting quite dirty inbside seems like you change lenses frantically
Too ho hum for any other comments? and I quite liked the first one.
Wendell I liked the first one for the reasons you described (I think?) ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I don't find any of them particularly sensational Peter, certainly not up to the standard of some of your recent posts. Don't get me wrong, I still like them all and my favourite is the first shot as it's so nicely framed. What really amazes me is how much you can change the perspective and feel of the shot, with minimal positional movement and changing the angle you're holding the camera - far more than you would logically expect.
Andrew
Stubbsy you are hereby elected chairman!
![]() President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Andrew - I guess they're not as good as my other recent posts. Re: the perspective changes, that's the thing that blew me away when I first started using the lens. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Stubbsy, I like the composition of the first but would I put it on the wall, no. I think it is a great image to start showing the effects of different focal lengths on field of view. You could start with this shot and go through your different focal lengths until you have framed the house which is just evident through the porte cochere (or a framed trellis). Would really show focal lengths off nicely, especially with such balanced composition
Peter,
Please note the first line of this article : http://www.luminous-landscape.com/colum ... t-04.shtml ![]() ![]() I'm not a fan of the distortion that this type of lens introduces... Such a field of view can be useful in some circumstances, but this wasn't one of them... You can kick me for my honesty on Saturday... ![]() Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Use those images as some proofs to show the lens's performance in using with DXO for writing up a review in Equipments Review section is fine to me, otherwise none of them good for hanging on the wall.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
John Honesty appreciated and the entry you linked to gave me a chuckle to start my day. I know fisheyes fall into the love/hate category and will certainly not kick you on Saturday. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|