pa


birdsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Images aren't showing Pa
Steve
------------------------------------------------------- So many things to do - so little time.
I love the banding around the doves neck. Perhaps the sparrow photo would be more striking if you tweaked the colour of the pink ledge it's standing on to match one of the colours in his (?her) plumage? Just a thought.
is a male sparrow. the female doesnt have the dark brown/black on the face. we used to get lots of little sparrows around here but havent really seen them for ages. the native birds seem to have driven them away looks like both could do with a little fill flash though Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
fill flash might be used if you metered a scene which was backlit for instance.
both these birds appear to have the light coming from behind them (not directly though.) the camera is reading that light and setting correct exposure for it but making the main subjects slightly dark. If you metered from the birds you may well get them nicely exposed but the backgrounds would no doubt be overexposed. taking the same shots with a flash set at -1ev for example, or higher (even up to -2 or beyond) would provide additional light for the bird but make little difference to the background. additionally it may add a hightlight in the eye. I would describe full flash as when not enough light exists to make a particular exposure so you use the flash at 0ev so it is 100% responsible for exposing the shot. Fill flash with birds in particular can really bring colours out of plumage because it reacts with the oils etc. too little is better than too much though because you dont want the subject to look over flashed you find a lot of nature photogs use flash on birds a lot of the time Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
in the old days you had to control things manually, setting the camera aperture to say f8 but telling the flash you were using f5.6.
cant speak for the canons but the nikon sb800 has a rocker switch on the back and you can reduce the amount of flash you want and still be under automatic control Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|