Self Portraits Take 2

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Self Portraits Take 2

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:00 pm

Couldn't improve the lights, but I thought I'd atleast use the tripod this time. Nothing outstanding but I had fun making them. Sorry but my shirt is off again :lol:

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby nito on Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:03 pm

Craig, I think you need a softer look to the portraits. It shows too much detail.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:19 pm

Nito, thanks. I haven't mastered making it softer.. how is this for a rough try ?

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby wendellt on Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:27 pm

the first one is very James Dean all you need is a cigarette
the subtle suggestion that your not wearign a shirt empowers this shot
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:27 am

Thanks for the feedback Wendell, I'm just messing around seeing what works and what doesn't. I passed over the next shot previously as it was OOF, but after I did a B&W conversion on it... it has a interesting mood to it. I didn't do any sharpening here as I wanted to keep the blurred look.

Image

My guess is it will be too OOF for most.

Edit : Added another shot.

Image
Last edited by Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Oneputt on Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:31 am

Craig these are a huge improvement on your first try. Keep at it. :wink:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:55 am

Oneputt wrote:Craig these are a huge improvement on your first try. Keep at it. :wink:


Thanks John, I'm enjoying messying around, I actually really like this version, but it's very PP'ed.

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Nnnnsic on Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:25 pm

I like the third one and the one above this post.

For that third one, did you solarize it?
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:36 pm

Nnnnsic wrote:I like the third one and the one above this post.

For that third one, did you solarize it?


The third one was me playing with the curves something drastic, I just kept bending them every which way till I got this rather bizarre mix of light and shadow. I'm not really familar with the solarize term, so not sure, but at a guess I doubt I solarized it.

I like the last offering too, it has a very.. hard to describe feel to it.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby avkomp on Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:37 pm

think the first one would have been much better with a plain white background.
high key would probably work well on it.

or mid grey perhaps.
the half and half weakens it.

we want to see you in the portrait. no background to cause distractions.

very james dean though.

Better than the self portrait thingy I just posted

:lol:

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:49 pm

Good point about the background, next time I'll actually make a bit more of a backdrop... I was trying to use a sheet, but geting it, me and the camera all in the right place (in my lounge room was challenging).
I had to look up some pics of James Dean so see why I'd got those comments, I can see what you and Wendell mean :) (I might try a high key version too as you suggested, but not sure what you meant by mid grey (could you provide an example?))
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby wendellt on Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:53 pm

the blurry versions look almost pornographic like tjheres something going on
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby avkomp on Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:13 pm

the POTW is a greyish B/g
kinda like that.

basically any shade that allows your features to be seen.
I think any lighter colour might do the job, especially with the monochrome treatment.
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:23 pm

wendellt wrote:the blurry versions look almost pornographic like tjheres something going on
Thanks Wendell for that lovely imagery, let me just say for the record, my shirt was off, but my wants were on!

the POTW is a greyish B/g
kinda like that.

Thanks Steve, I get the drift now, and will try to incorporate that into my next trial :)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Glen on Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:26 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:
wendellt wrote:the blurry versions look almost pornographic like tjheres something going on
Thanks Wendell for that lovely imagery, let me just say for the record, my shirt was off, but my wants were on!

Now I am worried Craig, your "wants were on" :?: Hope Katie was one of your wants.

Wendell you are a bugger, I will never be able to look at this series in the same light again!
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:32 pm

Glen wrote:
Alpha_7 wrote:
wendellt wrote:the blurry versions look almost pornographic like tjheres something going on
Thanks Wendell for that lovely imagery, let me just say for the record, my shirt was off, but my wants were on!

Now I am worried Craig, your "wants were on" :?: Hope Katie was one of your wants.

Wendell you are a bugger, I will never be able to look at this series in the same light again!


Dammit, should of double checked that before I hit post. I did mean Pants, not wants... LOL, funny how twisted my meaning can get with a typo.... looks at the keyboard W and P are miles from each other...
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby stubbsy on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:04 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:Dammit, should of double checked that before I hit post. I did mean Pants, not wants... LOL, funny how twisted my meaning can get with a typo.... looks at the keyboard W and P are miles from each other...

Now what would Freud say about that!

Craig. I really like the first of these images. The angle and the B & W treatment are spot on (and can't believe you didn't know who James Dean was). Below is my attempt at giving it the soft focus treatment. Blurred the entire image then removed the blur from eyes, eyebrows and lips. Then dodged the white of the eyes a touch and burnt the lips a little. If you don't like this, I can remove it.
Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:46 pm

Stubbsy I know of James Dean, I wasn't aware how popular moody black and white images were of him :) I'm not completely uncultured, just partially. Freud would be having a grand old time reading this thread I think.

Onto your version, I really like it, I obviously have to learn how to use the burn and dodge tools. With my version I basically had two layers, and cut out eyes of the blurry one (and it was dodgey). So I definetly prefer you technique, but.. well I feel I look quiet feminine now, or more so then earlier ? Anyone else get that vibe from stubbsy version ? Please keep the shot up btw Peter.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:49 pm

Craig,
Katie is looking behind your shoulder :lol: :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Katie G on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:50 pm

so this is what goes on in our loungeroom when i try and get an early night...maybe ill stay up and watch the photo shoot tonight :D

i like the original b&w photo!

Katie
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:54 pm

Birddog114 wrote:Craig,
Katie is looking behind your shoulder :lol: :lol: :lol:


Well she wasn't then, but she appears to be now 8) 8) 8)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Glen on Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:55 pm

Craig, I think Stubbsy has nailed this first one, you look young enough to be in a boy band. I liked the first too, but got distracted by Wendell's comments. You do look a bit like James Dean, here is a pic of him a few hours before he died in his 550 Spyder. I have always loved that look of confidence he had right before disaster :wink:

Image
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Glen on Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:00 pm

Craig, it is a touch more feminine with the lack of detail, don't worry wait 20 years and you will have a "character filled" face like the rest of us and be pining that smooth skin :lol:

The lighting is what made this one the best of yours so far Craig.




Katie, maybe tonight Craig will do the centrefold version with staples and all :lol:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Katie G on Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:07 pm

sorry - im not used to the inuendo on this forum - can you explain more for those of us with pure minds?
:?
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby Glen on Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:18 pm

Katie, sorry showing my age. Many, many years ago Playboy and Penthouse used to have 3 page pull out naked centrefolds, I don't think they still do but don't actually know. I actually had a short relationship with a centrefold, which meant I heard many. many versions of the comment "does she really have staples" or "have you seen her staples" which meant "have you seen her naked yet". So my comment meant Craig will do the naked centrefold version for you tonight :wink: Sort of loses something in the translation :lol:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Katie G on Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:21 pm

ok well it makes some sense now - but i think you would all rather be spared from witnessing an "Alpha_7 Centrefold".

dont give him any more ideas either - any of you !!!!! :x
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:56 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:With my version I basically had two layers, and cut out eyes of the blurry one (and it was dodgey). So I definetly prefer you technique, but.. well I feel I look quiet feminine now, or more so then earlier ? Anyone else get that vibe from stubbsy version ? Please keep the shot up btw Peter.

Maybe the darker lips make it look more feminine?

So far as technique. I used Nik Color Efex Pro Classical Soft Focus filter in what's called Selective Mode in Photoshop. Basically this let's you selectively paint the filter onto or paint it off of the image. I filled the entire image with the effect, then using the brush with a blurry edge painted the effect off (ie erased with the brush) on the aforementioned areas. Took about 2 minutes all up.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:02 pm

On behalf of Steve I'm posting for him a version he did of the same shot, but High Key treatment.

Image

I look like either I'm in heaven, or Boyzone now :)


Thanks Steve.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:04 pm

Katie G wrote:ok well it makes some sense now - but i think you would all rather be spared from witnessing an "Alpha_7 Centrefold".

dont give him any more ideas either - any of you !!!!! :x


Glen
I surely missed all of the centrefolds in the oldies days.
We used to hang them around our BOQ (Bachelor Officer Quater) and had been asked to stripped them off when our Base Commander came in for inspection, and we re-hang them next day. love to see them again.

Craig,
If there's, I'm sure one of your centrefolds will be hang around public places.
Try to make one and you'll be rich :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby wendellt on Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:05 pm

Nice one Craig
send it to a promo agency seriously you may get an offer
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Glen on Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:22 pm

wendellt wrote:Nice one Craig
send it to a promo agency seriously you may get an offer


Care to suggest one Wendell?



Birddy, I remember the days when centrefolds were big, those days are just a memory in these politically correct days
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Self Portraits Take 2

Postby MCWB on Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:58 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:Sorry but my shirt is off again :lol:

Clearly you are too sexy for your shirt! :D

Love that "Have you seen her staples?" call Glen, hilarious stuff! :lol:
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Matt. K on Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:36 pm

Craig
I think the first image is a fine portrait! Your composition works very well and the image sits big in the frame.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby macka on Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:55 pm

This thread is quite funny :D

Craig,
This is a much better attempt in my opinion. A bit of a shame about the distracting backgorund. Nice composition.
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:56 pm

macka wrote:This thread is quite funny :D

Craig,
This is a much better attempt in my opinion. A bit of a shame about the distracting backgorund. Nice composition.


Macka,
Craig is busy in setting up the studio and ready for the shoot :lol: :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby wally on Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:19 pm

craig yous are the bords sex symbols :lol:
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby SteveGriffin on Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:25 pm

Macka still wins Craig :shock:
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques