Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by makario on Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:31 pm
G'Day Everyone,
I have been playing with my Canon DSLR for a couple of months, been on a photographic workshop and finally have something worth posting on a forrum. Please critique and I am thick skinned  and wanna improve my composition and photo skills. All images have been PP with CS2 a bit of levels, curves, hue/saturation
Image 1
Tried to keep in mind the foreground, middleground and background rule
Image 2
Didnt want the surf to be blurred, however it does give a sense of movement to the image.
Image 3
Debris washed ashore.
Any and all inputs welcome.
Cheers
Makario
-

makario
- Member
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Keilor, Melbourne, VIC
-
by Glen on Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:33 pm
Makario, 2 has the most interest for me
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Zeeke on Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:40 pm
#2 for me aswell... the blurred foam gives the sense of movement... I like it!
Tim
-

Zeeke
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, Qld, AU
-
by Nnnnsic on Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:47 pm
#2. While I find the blur irritating, it has is the most interesting and unique.
-

Nnnnsic
- I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
-
- Posts: 7770
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
- Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
-
by Matt. K on Sat Mar 18, 2006 4:00 pm
makario
You were wrong! Not worth posting.
makario
Just kidding! I love the foorptints! Thanks for posting! 
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by Alpha_7 on Sat Mar 18, 2006 4:06 pm
Hi Makario,
Welcome to the forum, I hope you enjoy your stay, I'm sure you'll find us friendly and there is always so much to learn!
#3 Doesn't hold much interest for me
#1 I can tell you applied the rules, but the subject lacks punch or interest
#2 This is the definite winner for me, the blurr is an interesting affect in itself, but I think this shot really works for me.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by locopano on Sat Mar 18, 2006 4:46 pm
Hey maakiro, dont always follow the rules. Just look at a scene and try and photograph it the way you see it.
I think the 2nd image is the one with the best compostion. Somethig like that hung up on your wall is good if it reminds you of a holiday that you were on etc.
A nice 10-22 or 17mm 'ish lens would work well with a #2 type shot that way you could show the beach and water you walked along to get there from a wider perspective.
-
locopano
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:31 pm
- Location: Melbourne
by SteveGriffin on Sat Mar 18, 2006 6:08 pm
I llike #2 the best also
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
-

SteveGriffin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
- Location: Rochedale Brisbane
-
by LostDingo on Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:25 pm
I'll be a band wagon jumper and say I like the second the best, first shot advice.......get up early and take again......or late afternoon.......nothing like a bit of warm glow to accentuate your capture
-

LostDingo
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
- Location: Rozelle
by Alex on Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:20 pm
Great. I voted for No.2 also before reading other responses.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by mudder on Sat Mar 18, 2006 9:23 pm
G'day Makario,
My feeble attempt to critique...
#1, There doesn't seem to be a primary subject of focus, exposure's a smidge hot (as in a bit too far right on your histogram) so some of the highlights appear clipped, try reducing yoru exposure in CS2 a smidge, (maybe .3EV or so?) just to ease the highlights in the water and the rocks. The water as a middle-ground item has nice texture but no single subject for your eyes to settle on, foreground and background seem disconnected... My eyes seem to follow the foreground rocks and white water and run off the edge on the right
#2, Ahhh, this is nice, I like the movement in the water it works well here, might try getting down lower for one of these to give more "depth" to the scene, getting down low might also help emphasise the shadows too. Definately the pick of the bunch... Make me another for #2
#3, It's always interesting to see the every day items from a different viewpoint, wonder if a different framing might help to reduce the number of items in the image, it just seems a bit busy... The unsettled sand is catching the light too and creating highlights to take your eye away from the subject...
Cheers mate, good stuff, keep posting...
Which workshop was it? This looks like Wilson's Prom...
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by Jamie on Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:14 pm
Love the second picture, would also look great hanging on my wall (nearly the same colour as the sand).
Nicely done! 
Jamie
D70s - Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF - Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF - Nikon SB600
-
Jamie
- Member
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:40 pm
- Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne <D70>
-
by nito on Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:25 am
second shots is truely exceptional. 
-
nito
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
- Location: Gladesville, NSW
by makario on Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:59 pm
G'day Everyone,
Wow this site is really ALIVE... Thanks all for your valuable feedback.
Mudder: This is at Squeaky beach at Wilson Prom, howeve not at a workshop, but went with the family after the High Country workshop. They got a BIT annoyed with me cause I was holding back the group... next time just me, my camera and lenses... er.. maybe the misses as an after thought
Thanks again
Cheers
Makario
-

makario
- Member
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:01 pm
- Location: Keilor, Melbourne, VIC
-
by PiroStitch on Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:13 pm
i prefer the 2nd pic, tho from a lower angle with the footprints leading into the horizon may have created a better feel to the pic.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by ABG on Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:54 pm
Hi Makario and welcome to the forum.
The first shot really doesn't do anything for me - there's no real point of interest (to my eye at least). The second is a cracker and should be hanging on your wall. Great use of movement and composition. Well done. You've obviously got a very good eye. The third is okay, but there's too many things competing for my attention.
Andrew
-

ABG
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: Oatley, Sydney
-
by stubbsy on Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:30 pm
Makario
Welcome to the forum. Just in case you haven't got the idea already  I'd like to add my voice to the chorus that says #2 is best. Why? Unlike the other two it has a strong central element in the footprints to grab my eye.and the image is made stronger by the surging wave that's about to obliterate them. Taken together this makes the image work. Of course that doesn't mean it couldn't have been better eg as Leigh has mentioned, the blurry wave is a distraction and so this would have been better if sharper (so a faster shutter speed).
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|