| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Killakoala on Sun Jan 02, 2005 2:51 pm
 All pics taken from Garden Island Dockyard (while i was at work)
 Two things i would have liked to have done better.
 1. Another D70 with 18mm mounted in portrait mod e.
 2. D70 with 12mm mounted in landscape mod e.
 I could really have done with a 12-24mm lens as i was too close for the 18-70 to get a good view of the high exploding fireworks. Still i think i did ok with most of the shots, bit i did miss the 'big' bangs that exploded just out of shot.
 I do like the way the D70 produces/enhances colours. I set the camera with the Digital_Agfa curve with enhanced colour. Images were shot between 2-10 seconds and f8-f16. EDIT: forgot to add that i shot all in JPEG. A first for me   Here's the link
http://killakoala.smugmug.com/gallery/339470Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Greg B on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:13 pm
 Fantastic Steve. 10/10. Greg  - - - -  D200 etc
 Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
 - Arthur Schopenhauer
 
			
				 Greg B
Moderator Posts: 5938Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pmLocation: Surrey Hills, Melbourne
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Glen on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:23 pm
 I agree Steve 10/10. You could sell those (and the navy pays you to take these?) 
			
				 Glen
Moderator Posts: 11819Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pmLocation: Sydney - Neutral Bay -   Nikon
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by fozzie on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:31 pm
 Killakoala,
 Excellent 10/10.     I hope it was NYE 2004 otherwise another year has passed me very quickly.
 Cheers,fozzie
 When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
 
			
				 fozzie
Key Member Posts: 2806Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pmLocation: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter 
 
		
		
			
			
 by gstark on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:41 pm
 Steve,
 Excellent stuff.
 
 And yes, I saee why you feel a second body and wider glass would be good. Interestingly, last Sunday, on the harbour for the start of the race, I made a comment to Lindy that for the first time in ages I felt I needed to have two bodies (different glass on each) in order to be properly able to capture everything.
 g.Gary Stark
 Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
 The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
 
			
				 gstark
Site Admin Posts: 22926Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pmLocation: Bondi, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
 by meicw on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:49 pm
 Steve.  Great pics.  They are all winners IMHO.
 Regards
 Meic
 
			
				meicw
			Member Posts: 389Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pmLocation: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Killakoala on Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:56 pm
 I hope it was NYE 2004 otherwise another year has passed me very quickly. 
 I am confused so fear not.    The pics were taken on 1 Jan 2005, the fireworks don't start until after midnight so are therefore taken on 2005, not 2004. That's how i see it anyway     I had a similar discussion on 31 Dec 1999 about when the third millenium started (1 Jan 2001) and that the 2000 celebrations were one year too soon.     Gary, i think that we would have to go 'pro' to justify purchasing more than one camera    Glen, yes the Navy pays me heaps to allow me to take photos, but i do work for my money    Thanks all for the comments, i enjoyed the challenge of taking the shots.Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by paull on Sun Jan 02, 2005 4:09 pm
 Having just tried my hand at this I can appreciate how difficult it is. You have taken some beautiful photos that capture the fireworks + a sense of perspective. 
			
				paull
			Member Posts: 57Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:32 pmLocation: Sydney 
 
		
		
			
			
 by BBJ on Sun Jan 02, 2005 4:49 pm
 Hey KK, Good shots mate they are very nice indeeed and a good spot to take them from as well by the looks of it. Oneday ill get to a show where they go longer than few minutes so i too can get more shots of fireworks.
Cheers
 John
 BBJ
 D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40http://www.oz-images.com 
			
				 BBJ
Senior Member Posts: 3651Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pmLocation: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
 by brembo on Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm
 Very nice photos, the colours of the fireworks look great. What white balance settings did you end up using for them?
 And as fozie pointed out, it was New Years 2005, not NYE 2005   
			
				 brembo
Member Posts: 117Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:50 pmLocation: Southern Sydney 
 
		
		
			
			
 by Killakoala on Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:35 pm
 What white balance settings did you end up using for them? 
 I just used Auto WB. It's a smart camera, it can work it out   And as fozie pointed out, it was New Years 2005, not NYE 2005 
 OK i give up...    i am wrong   Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!! 
			
				 Killakoala
Senior Member Posts: 5398Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pmLocation: Southland NZ
				
			 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |