beach sunset

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

beach sunset

Postby NJ on Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:33 pm

a few more pics from the beach, was lucky to get a clear night and get these shots because it always seemed to cloud over at night.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Please C&C.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby Pa on Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:19 pm

hello nathan nice shots,2&4 i like best.i think that i might have cropped a bit off the bottom of them, theres a bit of dark sand erea on the right that i think does nothing for them but thats just my thinking.
pa
User avatar
Pa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: old bar, NSW 2430

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:35 pm

G'day,

C&C's a comin' :)

When going for sunset shots you're better off waiting for the sun to start going below the horizon (or maybe behind a cloud), otherwise the dynamic range will be difficult to deal with, hence the blown highlights. You can see in these shots, the color looks as thought it's getting deeper and deeper as the sun gets lower and lower in the horizon. In the last one, it looks like another 5 minutes or so would have seen the sky light up with color. Did it?

Once the sun reaches or goes below the horizon, that's usually when the sky lights up with the warm colors. The best sunsets are possibly when there's high cloud cover and the sun's light is reflected off them from over the horizon.

I think sunset shots need something (almost anything, a sillohette, rocks or dead tree etc.) in the foreground to give the image something in the foreground.

Also, get there with plenty of time to find "your spot" before the sunset happens, because once it starts you've sometimes only got a few minutes til it's gone... In my recent thread (http://www.dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php?t=15431) the color was only there for about 3-4 minutes. that's it, I nearly missed it because I was screwing around with the camera, looked up and DOH!

Sorry to be a pain, just trying to help :)

Cheers.

Oh, one more tip, when going to take sunset shots, take a torch with you as you're going to find your way back in the dark :lol:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby NJ on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:57 pm

hey andrew. thanks for the tips.
i kept taking photos throughout the sun going down and those seemed to be the most interesting to me. The sky didnt light up after it went below the horizon unfortunately. but here are a few more pics to give you an idea of what in ended up looking like.
Image
and later...
Image
and last
Image
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:08 pm

This one:
Image

Is the pick of the bunch for me, lovely color and a strong foreground interest in the rock...

Have you tried taking two exposures a stop or so apart and blending in PP? It's really easy and only takes a tick, but need a tripod to do it well (or I do anyway)... Great for images with large dynamic range like sunsets, worth a play :)

EDIT: Whoops, forgot to stir you up about the wonky horizon :wink:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby NJ on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:19 pm

mudder wrote:EDIT: Whoops, forgot to stir you up about the wonky horizon :wink:

haha, my Sony must have been the only one that i didnt correct in ps. lucky its not too bad.
yeh i used a tripod for these shots and im pretty sure i tried different exposures, i'll take a look later.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:22 pm

Yell out if you need a hand with merging, remember we still haven't had that photoshop pley...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby NJ on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:26 pm

oh yeh! that totally slipped my mind! sorry andrew! yeh we still need to have our ps play :) im doin year 12 this year, and it doesnt leave me with a lot of time over the weekends which really sucks, but yeh, we'll work something out soon enough. i should check up on the melbourne part of the forum more often to check if any mini-meets are happening.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:32 pm

NJ wrote:...i should check up on the melbourne part of the forum more often to check if any mini-meets are happening.


Get thee to the Melbourne Zoo on the week-end of April 23 for fun and frivolity with animals :wink:

Check: http://www.dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php?t=15210

or: http://www.dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php?t=15283
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby BT*ist on Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:45 am

Comments on the first three:

1. A bit too much white, there :D
2. I like it : "nuclear testing" comes to mind (boom!)
3. I like it alot : "The Eye of Sauron" - interesting vertical white slit in the sunlight. There's also a nice subtle secondary halo (I think). The ship on the horizon gives a bit of scale, and there is some foreground detail as well. Very cool.
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques