A quick portrait

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A quick portrait

Postby Alex on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:11 pm

Hello,

Took this portrait on a beach in January. It was mid day or thereabouts and the sun was pretty harsh. Took the first one with 50mm f1.4 1/350s f8. Flash was used, I think.

The 2nd one was with the kit lens at 60 mm with CPL 1/180 s f4.8 with flash.

Image

Image

Are any of these keepers, help me decide, please? Personally, I don't mind the first one.

What can be improved?

Thanks

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:30 pm

G'day mate,

Don't know the foggiest about taking pics of humans :lol: ...

The first one seems to be on the edge for exposure, but it's a nice portrait though...

The second one I think the sloping background edge of the rock may be influencing whether you like it...

If you wanna play in PP, I'd be tempted to soften the skin and sharpen items like eyebrows, eyes, lips etc...

Not much help I'm afraid, I don't think I've ever taken a photo of a human :lol:

Cheers mate...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby blinkblink on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:35 pm

Not much help I'm afraid, I don't think I've ever taken a photo of a human


I don't think I have. Everyone here can be thankfull that I will never take and post a self-portrait.
User avatar
blinkblink
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Romsey, Victoria

Postby mudder on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:37 pm

blinkblink wrote:
Not much help I'm afraid, I don't think I've ever taken a photo of a human


I don't think I have. Everyone here can be thankfull that I will never take and post a self-portrait.


Hmmm, just check out both our avatars!
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby marcotrov on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:17 pm

Alex as I was writing, before my family decided to overload the generator and cut me off :( , I think Mudder's comments are spot on. I think the expression on the second portrait is the more pleasing and so is the skin tone and exposures . I would probably be tempted to soften the reflector fill light even a tad more. I think the rock in the background, as mudder mentioned, does not enhance the image and a clear sky would create more separation between subject and background.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Alex on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:28 pm

Thanks for the comments, guys.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby johnd on Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:53 am

Hi Alex, I think the highlights in the first image are blown out a bit too much. Without wanting to sound too critical, I've noticed that in a number of your portaits and fashion shots with flash you've been getting blown highlights. This may be the effect you are after, but I'm not sure. In the second image, the flash is not as obvious but it's still apparent.

With these type of outdoor shots where, I asume, you are using the SB800 for fill flash in TTL BL mode, I'm suprised that you're getting the blown highlights. I've found it's almost impossible to blow highlights in TTL BL mode even if I wanted too. With the d70 in either A or S mode, the camera seems to work really well with the SB800 in TTL BL.

Maybe you are using TTL mode where the flash is providing a greater proportion of the light? Are you using a diffuser? I've found this helps soften the SB800's light. Are you using centre weighted metering and metering on her face? I find that works best with TTL BL. I think the full 3D matrix metering or whatever it's called would pick up a lot of the shadows in this image and could cause over exposure of her face.

Spot metering won't work at all in TTL BL mode, or more correctly the SB800 will switch from TTL BL into TTL mode if you have spot metering turned on on the d70. Again, even if this is the case, if you're spot metering on her face, the SB800 should get it right.

Please don't take this the wrong way as I'm not having a go at you. I just think that the SB800 is such a great piece of equipment, the exposures should be spot on and I'm just trying to understand what's happening with your use of flash.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Alex on Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:57 am

John,

Thanks very much for your advice. I used centre-weighted metering with SB800 set to iTTL with some negative exposure comp. (I think -1, but I'm not sure now). I never use BLTTL - may be I should be. The reason why I never used BLTTL for fill flash is because I read from many sources that BLTTL gives unpredictable results. May be BLTTL should be the go for me for now, when I use flash as a fill.

Alex

P.s. the diffuser was on.
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques