Lighting Experiments (frog)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lighting Experiments (frog)

Postby Slider on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:22 pm

Trying out some new lighting techniques and found the perfect little subject at the dam.

Sedge frog is approx 2cm long.

D70s with Sigma 180 Macro with 3x extension tube set.

Used SB800 (with Lightsphere) as master and SB600 (with diffuser) as slave.

Bounced the SB600 off a silver car sun reflector (the soft type with the dull silver/grey coating)

Exposure time: 1/60s
Aperture: f/20.0
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure: aperture priority
Image

Image

Image
Last edited by Slider on Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby marcotrov on Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:34 pm

Mark that lens is really sharp and your abilty to control the plane of focus even at small f/stops is excellent.
Overall the images are evenly lit with no obvious pockets of shadow though for my liking a tad too much light. Perhaps that could be part of the issue that with so much light the image looks a little flat and lacks the modelling a little shadow here and there gives. The second thing that hits me is the perspective. I'm not sure that the crops do much for the image here in #1 and #2
I hope this all makes sense mark?
There also seems to be a little too much yellow what WB did you use? Auto or Flash? Generally the colours don't seem as vibrant and punchy as you usually produce.
As an experiment with lighting I think you have a good baseline to explore creating a bit more modelling and sculpturing.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Slider on Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:00 pm

marcotrov wrote:Mark that lens is really sharp and your abilty to control the plane of focus even at small f/stops is excellent.
Overall the images are evenly lit with no obvious pockets of shadow though for my liking a tad too much light. Perhaps that could be part of the issue that with so much light the image looks a little flat and lacks the modelling a little shadow here and there gives. The second thing that hits me is the perspective. I'm not sure that the crops do much for the image here in #1 and #2
I hope this all makes sense mark?
There also seems to be a little too much yellow what WB did you use? Auto or Flash? Generally the colours don't seem as vibrant and punchy as you usually produce.
As an experiment with lighting I think you have a good baseline to explore creating a bit more modelling and sculpturing.
cheers
marco


Thanks Marco, it sure is a sweet lens.

I know what you mean with the shadows and the perspective is a bit ordinary. Much better to get down low but the little frog would not cooperate and was tucked down in the reeds close to the water. Would have had to go into the dam and shoot from teh other side. I have done that for some of my dragonfly shots but not tonight :lol: Was more an experiment with the lighting than an attempt to get a top froggie shot .

And yes I have a much better idea where to head from a lighting perspective, but I will be doing a lot more experimenting yet.
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:46 am

Slider, not sure if you've nailed the lighting yet, but keep continuing your experiments. (It's a bit too strong and harsh for my liking). BTW in that last shot, was that a tick on the frogs back?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Slider on Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:53 am

Alpha_7 wrote:Slider, not sure if you've nailed the lighting yet, but keep continuing your experiments. (It's a bit too strong and harsh for my liking). BTW in that last shot, was that a tick on the frogs back?


Craig, I think it was a house-ant or mite of some sort. The frog was only 2cm long so whatever it is it is pretty small. Thanks for the feedback. :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques