Birds at the National ZooModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Birds at the National ZooThis was kind of an informal lens test that went awry. I have a Nikkor 180/2.8 and 105/2DC that I don't use often so I decided to use them today. Here is an image from each lens. They are a bit noisy as I shot these at ISO 800 on D1x bodies and in jpg rather than raw (by mistake). Still I think they show the capabilities of the lenses fairly well. I used three Nikkors, the AF-S 300 f4 with a TC-17e II, an AF 180 f2.8 ED-IF, and an AF 105 f2DC ED-IF. No crops, no corrections of any kind, and no sharpening. These are full frame so I know the composition could be better in some cases.
http://www.pbase.com/cameraguy21773/ima ... medium.jpg AF-S 300 f4 with a TC-17e II http://www.pbase.com/cameraguy21773/ima ... medium.jpg AF 180 f2.8 ED-IF http://www.pbase.com/cameraguy21773/ima ... medium.jpg AF 105 f2DC ED-IF regards
Mike Parker Frederick, MD Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
Hi Mike.
The images are a little small for me to get a real feel for them. Having said that, and taking into account your comments about framing, sharpening and composition, I think the flamingo shot is the standout. I like the way it's shot at eye-level rather than looking downwards, which, for me, detracts from the appeal of the second shot, a teal(?) Also, the other duck in the background is distracting but of course that would be the first thing to go if you cropped so it's no big deal. The last shot doesn't do a lot for me, I think due to the image size - it'd be nice to see the bird's eye and the overall detail doesn't keep up with the first two. Just my thoughts. ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Yes they are small. I should have left the medium.jpg off them. On PBase they are full size or can be set to full size and the exif is there too.
regards
Mike Parker Frederick, MD Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|