

few more head shots"pet photography",DU warn.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
few more head shots"pet photography",DU warn.this is my other pet.this time i tried to make eyes main focus place but still its not posible to keep eveything in focus,handheld shutterspd limit and availble light.
![]() ![]() Last edited by PALL on Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pall.A.
Wowsa! I am in no way a cat person, but they are so big and in your face, full of detail.. I really like them the eye isn't in focus in the second but it actually doesn't suffer too much due to the hi level of detail on the (snout) nose ?
For me these shots make the cat seem more wild (perhaps as it looks so big and in your face) rather then your standard domestic pet shots.
Wow - these are great Pall! Not your usual cat shots, that's for sure. Agree with Craig's comments about the proximity giving a wild look to the feline. Mouse-eye view?
![]() ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
The DOF is a bit shallow for me, but agreed that it's def not your average cat pic
![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
The cats colour is defiantly what makes the shot. Warm and sharp, although my only issue is the eyes again. The pupil, however small it gets, is what you are drawn to in an eye and it just seems furry, where as the furry bit is sharp.
![]() Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
definitely an improvement over the cat shot you posted the other day.
Ditto what has already been said about these shots steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
excellent angle! your lens showed some superb detail in the in focus area! great job and cant wait to see more!
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
Just WOW!!!!!
Love the idea, and the execution is fantastic, I actually really like the shallow DOF - for me it really works !!! Know what I'll be doing when I head home tonight ![]() Congrats on 2 great shots Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|