Rachael - Beach Shoot

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Rachael - Beach Shoot

Postby Cyrus on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:03 pm

I realise that this site isn't really model based but I figure it's about time I posted some of my work. I recently had the good fortune to work with Rach and I had an absolute ball. We hit the beach very early and made the best of the varying light throughout the early hours of the day.

Here are two from the shoot.

Comments always welcome! :wink:

Cyrus

Image
Image
Last edited by Cyrus on Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
It is more important to click with people than to click the shutter.
Alfred Eisenstaedt - father of photojournalism
User avatar
Cyrus
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Mount Ommaney - Brisbane

Postby Bretski on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 pm

Nice Work...
Canon 350D
Bretski
Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: Rockhampton

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:13 pm

Cyrus,

Thanks for sharing, while the site doesn't focus on any particular form of photography certainly many of use enjoy model shoots.

I really like this too shots, love the rim lighting affect in the first, and the exposure on both are great, perhaps the pose could be a little better in the second but it's a minor niggle.

What sort of equipment were you using (if you don't mind me asking?) flash, reflectors ? Did you have an assistant ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby gstark on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:19 pm

The first one is great. Good backlighting and rim effect, and great exposure on the face.

The shadows on the second are way too harsh for my tastes; the lighting here is inconsistant - look at the shadows formed by the beads on Rachel's chest, and also on the inside of her left arm - these come from the wrong side based upon the highlights on her face.

The shadows suggest that there was some form of fill lighting or a reflector in use but I don't think that this secondary source has been diffused effectively enough, and it's perhaps not been balanced correctly for this situation.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Cyrus on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:20 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:Cyrus,

Thanks for sharing, while the site doesn't focus on any particular form of photography certainly many of use enjoy model shoots.

I really like this too shots, love the rim lighting affect in the first, and the exposure on both are great, perhaps the pose could be a little better in the second but it's a minor niggle.

What sort of equipment were you using (if you don't mind me asking?) flash, reflectors ? Did you have an assistant ?


Thanks for your comments Alpha_7. IN regards to the second shot I have a few variations where Rachel is looking at the lens and in other directions but this one just seemed to hit a different note for me, very relaxed.

The gear I was using on the day was my Canon 350D with Tamron 28-75 lens and 580EX flash, at times on a tripod operating remotely. For that shot it was mounted on the camera though. I was fortunate on this ocassion that Rachel brought her boyfriend along and I was able to utilise him to hold my reflector - silver side in this case.

Cheers
Cyrus
It is more important to click with people than to click the shutter.
Alfred Eisenstaedt - father of photojournalism
User avatar
Cyrus
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Mount Ommaney - Brisbane

Postby Cyrus on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:23 pm

gstark wrote:The first one is great. Good backlighting and rim effect, and great exposure on the face.

The shadows on the second are way too harsh for my tastes; the lighting here is inconsistant - look at the shadows formed by the beads on Rachel's chest, and also on the inside of her left arm - these come from the wrong side based upon the highlights on her face.

The shadows suggest that there was some form of fill lighting or a reflector in use but I don't think that this secondary source has been diffused effectively enough, and it's perhaps not been balanced correctly for this situation.


Yeah fair comments Gary, as it turns out, the shadows were exactly what I was trying to capture, originally I had planned to convert the shot to B & W but the colours seemed too nice to lose. It's funny how some people love the shadows and others absolutely hate them, that's what I love about photography. :wink:

Thanks again for the comments

Cheers guys
Cyrus
It is more important to click with people than to click the shutter.
Alfred Eisenstaedt - father of photojournalism
User avatar
Cyrus
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Mount Ommaney - Brisbane

Postby Glen on Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:08 pm

The first is spectacular, great use of lighting
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby avkomp on Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:10 pm

sweet lighting on the first one.
great shot. love it

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Alex on Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:20 pm

The first one is great, I like it a lot.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby byrt_001 on Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:59 pm

hi

i also like the first one, for the tones of colour in her face. the only thing i could have like was that, been on the beach and with a heavy jacket...maybe she could have her hands on the top part of the jacket. but... still, i really like the shot. is this the only one in this series? could be easily used as a cover shot for a magazine

the second one her face and lighting is just a bit too strong.

thanks for sharing your work, she is lovely by the way.

christian
check my website>> http://www.6701.sunpixs.com
User avatar
byrt_001
Member
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: beatifuloutback,carnarvon. wa

Postby Steffen on Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:49 am

I agree, the first one is a ripper of a shot.

If at all possible, lose the black frame, unless this was shot for an obituary :shock:

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby bago100 on Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:46 am

Cyrus
Your first photo is absolutely stunning. Excellent work!
I think because your first photo is so good, your second photo by comparison with the first, does not have the same visual impact.
However in saying that, your second photo is very pleasing on the eye also and is more than capable of being a good photo on it's own.
Cheers
Graham
User avatar
bago100
Senior Member
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Shanghai China until Feb 2010

Postby Slider on Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:58 am

Love the first shot. Absolutely stunning :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby DionM on Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:00 am

Personally I like the second shot the best.

The first I like the concept but I think the sun backlighting is a touch too strong? Lose definition around the edge of the hood, and the lighting on her face appears just a little 'flashed'.

Still, the first is a great shot, but I like the second more.

Well done on both counts anyway!

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane

Postby Neeper on Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:10 am

I love rim lighting and front lighting..... obviously I LOVE the first one. The hood on her jacket makes the rim light look that much better. Well done!
Johnny
D200, D70, 18-70mm, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 24-120mm VR, 12-24mm Tokina, 70-300mm Tamron, Lens Baby 2.0, Peleng Fisheye 8mm, SB800, Alien Bees Studio Setup: 1 B400, 2 B800, 1 B1600, Sekonic L-358
http://www.jtimagesonline.com
User avatar
Neeper
Member
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada

Postby Cyrus on Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:35 am

Thanks very much to everybody for your honest comments. I chose two very different shots to post thinking that either one should appeal to most people. It's always very interesting to hear different peoples views on why a shot works or doesn't work for them.

I might post some more shots from this shoot later.

Cheers
Cyrus
It is more important to click with people than to click the shutter.
Alfred Eisenstaedt - father of photojournalism
User avatar
Cyrus
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Mount Ommaney - Brisbane

Postby jdear on Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:59 am

did you use a gold surface at all on a reflector?

Im playing around with my 5in 1 bottletop at the moment and Im curious the sort of difference the surfaces makes.

How far away was the reflector?
Holding a 95cm reflector close to people has a tendency to cause them to squint! :)

J
User avatar
jdear
Senior Member
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

Postby Cyrus on Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:07 am

jdear wrote:did you use a gold surface at all on a reflector?

Im playing around with my 5in 1 bottletop at the moment and Im curious the sort of difference the surfaces makes.

How far away was the reflector?
Holding a 95cm reflector close to people has a tendency to cause them to squint! :)

J


I used the silver side of my reflector (i only have white and silver at the moment) and it was about 150cm away from the subject. :wink:

Cyrus
It is more important to click with people than to click the shutter.
Alfred Eisenstaedt - father of photojournalism
User avatar
Cyrus
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Mount Ommaney - Brisbane

Postby Cyrus on Sun Apr 09, 2006 3:45 pm

Just a quick note of changing Rachel to Rachael.. the second spelling is the correct version. All of the pics have been editted to show the correct spelling now. Woops! :wink:

Cyrus
It is more important to click with people than to click the shutter.
Alfred Eisenstaedt - father of photojournalism
User avatar
Cyrus
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Mount Ommaney - Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques