Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Newidude on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:00 pm
As most would know i recently gave my sensor my first ever wet clean, and although happy that all spots had gone, I got the impression all my images looked softer than they should.
Looking at my sensor there was no apparent haze or residue from the clean so I decided to do a test on my top lcd of my camera.
First I did as said here following all steps from 1 to 6 and noticed that on this glass I could see a minor misty residue was left behind after the second wipe.
Then I did the same again although only steps from 1 to 3, and then change the pec pad and then repeat the steps on the opposite side of the sensor. No residue to bee seen this time.
I also found (like many others have said) that 1 drop seems to have a better effect.
Here is a fence pailing at actual pixles after the first clean following all steps
And here is the same image shot after the second replacing the pec pad before doing the opposite side.
I'm still not overly happy as I believe that my results are still softer than they were before my wet clean. But until I can find a cloth that leaves less residue behind than the Pec Pad's, I am just going to have to deal with it.
Brad
Never argue with a fool. They will drag you down to there level, then beat you with experience.
Although I gotta admitt, sometimes it makes for a good laugh 
-
Newidude
- Member
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:55 pm
- Location: Newcastle
by Alpha_7 on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:06 pm
How much fluid have you been using on the pec pads ?
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Newidude on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:10 pm
Newidude wrote:I also found (like many others have said) that 1 drop seems to have a better effect.Brad
First couple was 2 when it was really bad. Probably the last 5 or so were just the 1.
Last edited by Newidude on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Never argue with a fool. They will drag you down to there level, then beat you with experience.
Although I gotta admitt, sometimes it makes for a good laugh 
-
Newidude
- Member
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:55 pm
- Location: Newcastle
by birddog114 on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:11 pm
Pec pads is the only cloth in this world to clean CCD! and it's safe.
Don't be fooled by trying other type of rags.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by gstark on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:23 pm
birddog114 wrote:Pec pads is the only cloth in this world to clean CCD! and it's safe. Don't be fooled by trying other type of rags.
So, 320 grit wet and dry is not recommened then? 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by DionM on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:25 pm
gstark wrote:birddog114 wrote:Pec pads is the only cloth in this world to clean CCD! and it's safe. Don't be fooled by trying other type of rags.
So, 320 grit wet and dry is not recommened then? 
I was gonna try some 50 grit  Give my photos some real texture.
Newidude - please keep us informed. I have got the fluid etc but have been too scared to actually do my sensor for the same concerns about fluids on the sensor. 
Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes. http://www.dionm.net/
-
DionM
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
- Location: Holland Park, Brisbane
-
by Matt. K on Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:19 pm
Soemthing is not right here...what fluid are you using?
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by mudder on Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:20 pm
G'day,
I've done a couple of wet cleans on my D70, first was a bit nerve racking but OK after that... Since the second one though I got a rocket blower and haven't given the sensor (or the glass over it anyway) a wet clean since... Best thing I've bought I reckon... I can even see through my viewfinder now, looked like a bowl of spaghetti before...
Never had residue before though, using eclipse and a swab... If you can see it with your eye, then something's not right,
I assume you're using eclipse fluid?
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by Steffen on Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:43 am
There is no way any surface residue could have produced that kind of softness. Well, maybe a smearing with vaseline could have...
To me it looks like you're knocking the sensor in and out of alignment from one cleaning run to the next. (Is this even possible? I haven't disassembled a Nikon DSLR - yet.)
The first of the two images is plain and simple out of focus, across the frame. Did you notice any sensor movement during cleaning? What f-stop were you using? I guess with anything slower than f/1.4 the sensor displacement would have to be noticable to produce this much OOF.
Maybe you should have it looked at by a repair pro? Possibly something else is playing up and causing intermittent bad focus?
Cheers
Steffen.
-

Steffen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: Toongabbie, NSW
by birddog114 on Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:44 am
Matt. K wrote:Soemthing is not right here...what fluid are you using?
98 PULP or AVGAS or JP4 
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by Glen on Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:10 am
birddog114 wrote:Matt. K wrote:Soemthing is not right here...what fluid are you using?
98 PULP or AVGAS or JP4 
Birddy, you have found the problem, Brad should be using the new 100 PULP which has just come out.
Are you sure that isn't blur in the first one, Brad? I have never seen a result like that.
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by gstark on Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:37 pm
Matt. K wrote:Soemthing is not right here...what fluid are you using?
Johnnie Walker red label.
Should be using the black label
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
Return to General Discussion
|