Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by elffinarts on Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:29 am
handheld 50mm f1.8 natural light at 1/80th ISO400.
I was shooting a wedding for the first time, and more than a little stressed out. Fairly good hit rate for decent shots considering the wedding was in changing partial shade, whitest of whites against deepest blacks.
Next time I am borrowing a second Nikon to avoid getting damned random dust bunnies from changing lenses while out in the field in a breeze. (Bris Botanical Gardens @ Mt Coot-Tha)
2 of every 3 guests at least had a 4MP camera. I felt as though not having a D2X was just not good enough.
another shot I liked:

Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
-

elffinarts
- Member
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Albion, Brisbane
-
by Hudo on Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:57 am
Hi Mark,
Never feel by not having D2X youre inadequate. Being a photographer and doing weddings at that is far more than owning a 4MP P&S. Being in the business and being profressional has no relationship with how much you have spent on your camera and other equipment.
I love my toys, well I'm a boy but if I have learn't one thing the past 2 years it's having good "reasonable" equipment to do the job is a must but reasonable doesn't always equate to a what is on the top shelf.
I have a video interview going to air on SBS Noise TV on 29th April and my video equipment while good is a far reach from the $100K broadcast equipment the ig boys use but good enough for SBS to air my work.
Noboubt your pics will make a bride and groom very happy.
Mark
-
Hudo
- Member
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:18 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
-
by elffinarts on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:22 pm
thanks mate. that comment was half the fact that guests had digi slr's as well as pocket rockets, and that I decided that I have lens lust for an 85mmF1.4 on a D2X. lol
Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
-

elffinarts
- Member
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Albion, Brisbane
-
by gstark on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:34 pm
elffinarts wrote:2 of every 3 guests at least had a 4MP camera. I felt as though not having a D2X was just not good enough.
Irrelevant.
When I was shooting weddings, I was using film, and so too was every other guest with a camera. They, ostensibly, were shooting at the same resolution as I was.
The real issue is what were you doing with your camera that made your images different from the mundane?
There is nothing wrong with the two images that you posted, and that is strongly suggestive (to me) that you're on the right track.
Ignore the others, and do what you need to in order to get the results that you wish to see.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by elffinarts on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:44 pm
well put, thanks Gary!
that didn't sate my lust for new gear though. hehe 
Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
-

elffinarts
- Member
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Albion, Brisbane
-
by gstark on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:45 pm
Mark,
elffinarts wrote:that didn't sate my lust for new gear though. hehe 
Good. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Hudo on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:50 pm
Mark,
Nothing wrong with Lens Lust nor new toys for us boys but as Gary put it it's what you do with it and how you use it is what really counts.
Mark
-
Hudo
- Member
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:18 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
-
by Aussie Dave on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:50 pm
I completely agree. If you know what you're doing, and have a fantastic 4MP P&S camera, a good photographer should be able to make the most out of the camera's functions to produce wonderful images.
What does this prove ? It's not the camera, but the photographer that makes the biggest difference.
Looking like you know what you're doing (and feeling comfortable doing so) will always look much more impressive (and professional) than someone stumbling around with a huge camera, lenses, flash unit(s), tripod, bags of lenses, camera assistant...etc...not looking sure what they should do next.
In my mind, a professional wedding photographer is not just being paid to take good photos. They are also there to keep everyone in line and keep the ball rolling. Emotions and excitement easily overtake people and what should take 5 minutes generally takes 30 mins.....but perhaps some people only equate the photographer with the images
...and as for the lust....that's on a completely different level again 
Dave Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
-

Aussie Dave
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]
by Grev on Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:17 am
Nice shots, I don't belive I saw the first one but I was there when you took the second one, Mark.
The conversion to B&W adds quite more emotive to them.
-

Grev
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
- Location: 4109, Brisbane.
-
by elffinarts on Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:49 am
Grev wrote:Nice shots, I don't belive I saw the first one but I was there when you took the second one, Mark. The conversion to B&W adds quite more emotive to them.
and your help holding the SB800 where I needed it when I needed was VERY appreciated mate
the first shot was pre-wedding - while you were in town calling me for directions. 
Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
-

elffinarts
- Member
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Albion, Brisbane
-
by wmaburnett on Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:56 am
You did a great job from the shots ive seen posted here! Keep up the Great OWrk and no worries about anyoen else with a camera, just concentrate on what your doing! They are probably wishing they had your stuff still
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
-
wmaburnett
- Member
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: Minnesota, United States
-
by elffinarts on Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:17 pm
Thanks William
I had the happy couple over last night - they got to go through all 500 of the shots instead of just the 250 that the coppermine gallery database loaded (still looking into why it did that)
They're very very happy. I'm looking forward to shooting more weddings at a more reasonable price (for me) and earning funds to feed my Nikkor lusting. 
Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com
D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
-

elffinarts
- Member
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Albion, Brisbane
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|