
Do you like me? Why? Why not?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Do you like me? Why? Why not?Does anyone like this image? Can you tell me why? I just love it and I don't understand why. I took it from a moving car on the highway. I probably should have cropped off the left side.
![]()
It's a bit desolate and bleak looking. I don't really know what is is but there is something in the image I do like.
I would think about cloning out the power lines though. Cheers! 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
dave:
like it... the simple composition goes against all the rules, but that is what i like most. the digital noise does not bother me, maybe almost adds to the feel of the image i might crop out the sign beside the fourth tree from the left, and the tel lines in the sky to make it even more simple which i feel makes this image so interesting.
Thanks guys. I didn't even notice the sign, and thought about the lines but I wasn't sure so I didn't bother. Maybe I'll revisit.
I personally think there is too much grassy stuff, I felt it looked better with around half the grass cropped.
Sky and trees work well though Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Dave
I think this works very well. The grain in the sky and the tones in the clouds are a wonderful contrast to those not quite symmetrical blobs of trees. I think a touch of a trim off the bottom may improve it (and clone the power lines), but this would only be tinkering at the margins of what is a bloody good shot to start with. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Subjectivity is so full of surprises.
![]() Apart from the individual elements tackled very nicely i.e. the graininess, the contrast, the composition seems to mostly work and from the point of view of the possible message the clean ordered row of trees (only held back by the distracting telegraph lines and the nuisance sign under one of the trees) against the broody horizon versus the chaotic scramble of fallen timber and undergrowth in the foregound BUT somehow for me it doesn't quite all sit together so that the image in my view lacks that essential appeal that I have come to associate with your dramatic and visually stimulating and commanding images Dooda. cheers marco
i like it, its simple, has a bit of grain which i like in this situation, reminds me of an older fine art print.
~William Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
I'm intrigued a little by Marco's statement, and probably what many are also thinking. though this probably isn't as good as my usual fare, I like it a lot more. It sort of mocks the idea of tripod (it's taken from a moving car) and throws the rule of thirds rule to the wind.
So why is it that when we put out something that represents a departure that much better? Is it representation that we're progressing as artists, a stab at the idea that we aren't gimmicky, or a one trick pony? That perhaps there is some total genius lieing within, waiting to be recognized?
perhaps its just simply a nice pic !! Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|