Morning @ the farm

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Morning @ the farm

Postby ONV73C on Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:00 am

4 pics from the farm up in Kempsey, taken at around 7am with some low lying fog.

Purposely blown out. Feedback welcome


Image


Image


Image


Image


Michael
"You are talking about the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind"
User avatar
ONV73C
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Sydney - Leichhardt

Postby nat on Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:14 am

Nice work Michael.
I really like the way you have framed the web in #2. It is quite a striking image.
The high contrast and desaturation makes #4 stand out as well.
I have to say that I find the blown areas of #1&3 a little too distracting however.
User avatar
nat
Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia

Postby drifter on Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:03 am

Michael the second shot is excellent and the effect works well .The first one looks pushed just a fraction too far .
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Postby Alex on Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:07 pm

Love the 2nd and 3rd shots. Excellent work.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby mudder on Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:59 pm

Good strong composition and creative use of light. Particularly enjoyed the second and third images with the backlighting on the spiders webs...

The power pole in the first distracts me, but you may you may have intended to place it there in the image...

The last one might be worth cropping into more of a pano style, cropping some of the foreground?
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:54 pm

Yes the web shots are really nice. Well done!
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Killakoala on Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:50 pm

I really like the style you have created. It has a nice impact.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby ONV73C on Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:04 pm

Thanks for the comments :)

Some of the blown out areas aren't everyones cup of tea, but i couldn't resist beefing up these images with the high contrast to achieve the style.

mudder, i agree, the last one could lose some of the grass, it is a slightly dead area of the pic.
"You are talking about the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind"
User avatar
ONV73C
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Sydney - Leichhardt

Postby wmaburnett on Mon May 01, 2006 3:33 pm

Great detail in t he spiderwebs!
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby marcotrov on Mon May 01, 2006 4:12 pm

The second one works well. It would be greatly enhanced in my opinion if it weren't for the telegraph pole and lines. Although one perspective could be that it stands as tension between the natural and man-made world.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon May 01, 2006 5:45 pm

#2 and #4 are my pick here the spider web and the fog/cloud intrigue me in the images (respectively).

#1 and #3 are weaker IMO, but I condemn the experimentation.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Willy wombat on Mon May 01, 2006 6:14 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:#2 and #4 are my pick here the spider web and the fog/cloud intrigue me in the images (respectively).

#1 and #3 are weaker IMO, but I condemn the experimentation.


Condemn the experimentation :? . Surely you mean "commend" Craig? :D
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby ONV73C on Mon May 01, 2006 11:05 pm

marcotrov wrote:The second one works well. It would be greatly enhanced in my opinion if it weren't for the telegraph pole and lines. Although one perspective could be that it stands as tension between the natural and man-made world.
cheers
marco


Yes! very good take, i like it... although it wasn't intended ;)

lol @ Willy, well spotted
"You are talking about the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind"
User avatar
ONV73C
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Sydney - Leichhardt

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue May 02, 2006 12:04 am

Willy wombat wrote:
Alpha_7 wrote:#2 and #4 are my pick here the spider web and the fog/cloud intrigue me in the images (respectively).

#1 and #3 are weaker IMO, but I condemn the experimentation.


Condemn the experimentation :? . Surely you mean "commend" Craig? :D


Ooops! I must be going Banana's!

I did mean Commend. :oops:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Jonas on Tue May 02, 2006 10:13 am

Hi Michael, I really liked the effects on these pics. I was a bit distracted by the black fence post of #1, but #2 and #3 are impressive. That spider web really stands out.

Well done.
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70, Sigma 70-300DG APO
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonasphoto/
Jonas
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Miami, Gold Coast, QLD


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques