Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by padey on Mon May 01, 2006 10:17 am
Hi all.
Like anyone photographer, I have the ingrain desire to only show my most favourable or signature work. Shots like these images from Saturday ( http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/pade/1.jpg change the url and go from 1 through to 7 ) But in this case I’d rather show you the stuff that I’m working on, shots that are technically and/or composure and/or environmentally challenging.
In PP I’ve only tweaked WB in RAW->jpg conversion, resized and sharpened.
The idea with these shots is to try and get an even exposure with the shadowed foreground and sun lit background. Well that’s the idea anyway. Composure wise, I was trying to let the natural lines of the autumn trees take you into the background, along with the bank of the lake and have the B&G fill the foreground. This was taken with the S3, which gives a pleasing Velvia look to the natural colours. ISO100, 12mm @ f5.7, flash was pulled back 2/3 stops in an attempt to get some form of even light.
Same idea behind this second one, but I face some significant challenges with light hitting the face without blowing out the dress. Easy to fix in PP. ISO800, 12mm @ f4, flash was pulled back at least 1 stop, but looks to be more. Environmentally, I was lying in the dirt near the feet of the couple and I didn’t have much room to move back.
This was defiantly a first, taking a long exposure on a floating wharf. Sun was virtually gone, 2sec, f6.7 12mm ISO800 and rear sync long exposure flash with SB800. Meaning the flash fires twice, once at the beginning of the exposure and once just before the shutter closes.
In the time it took me to drop my tripod, the light was goooooone.. Similar setup at the one above, just different composition although I had to wait for a boat to pass for the wharf to stop rocking.
So if you've got a critique, that would be great. Especially if any of you have used the SB800 in fading light/non studio environment. Ultimately, I will be able to post process the shots, pull up the shadows, punch the garden colours, vignette and soft blur the exterior parameters of the image to draw the image that I’m looking for.
cheers
Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by dooda on Mon May 01, 2006 10:29 am
I'm really impressed. Great exposure on the dress, even throughout the frame. Perhaps the last one needs to be zoomed in a touch, but this is terrific, it looks like you're coming right along with the SB 800.
-

dooda
- Party Animal
-
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon May 01, 2006 10:54 am
Some nice shots in the 'gallery' and posted here, I appreciate you showing not just your prefered or best shots but the ones that need work or are a bit more experimental.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by shutterbug on Mon May 01, 2006 11:53 am
Great images and the use of fill flash. No complains 
-

shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by BBJ on Mon May 01, 2006 12:03 pm
All looks good to me Andrew, and wel i take my hat off to you who dod this type of work and to be creative is something i am not.
Well done.
Cheers
John
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-

BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by Wocka on Mon May 01, 2006 12:16 pm
Hi Andrew,
Love the shots and all your work from your website.
Keep on posting.
Cheers
Warwick ======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
-

Wocka
- Member
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches
by losfp on Mon May 01, 2006 1:33 pm
Andrew, that first photo is a cracker, love it!
Wedding work is tough... High pressure? You bet!
-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
by padey on Mon May 01, 2006 2:09 pm
This was a real fun wedding. They tend to hummmm along quite fast.
I'll post some shots later of the 105mm DC that birdy lent me. Amazing lens..
Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by marcotrov on Mon May 01, 2006 3:14 pm
All gorgeous images Andrew. The exposure is spot on and you have really highlighted the capacity of the SB800. I assume the AF-S 12-24 F/4 Nikon was used?
Thanks for sharing some of the technique. Interested to know a little more about the rear sync long exposure flash with the SB800. Any tips you could share?> And when in your opinion do you find it useful apart from the shot you took using the technique?  I'm trying to get the best out of mine at the moment.
cheers
marco
Last edited by marcotrov on Mon May 01, 2006 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by wmaburnett on Mon May 01, 2006 3:15 pm
I like these a lot, the last one is my favorite by far, well done!
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
-
wmaburnett
- Member
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: Minnesota, United States
-
by padey on Mon May 01, 2006 3:55 pm
marcotrov wrote:All gorgeous images Andrew. The exposure is spot on and you have really highlighted the capacity of the SB800. I assume the AF-S 12-24 F/4 Nikon was used? Thanks for sharing some of the technique. Interested to know a little more about the rear sync long exposure flash with the SB800. Any tips you could share?> And when in your opinion do you find it useful apart from the shot you took using the technique?  I'm trying to get the best out of mine at the moment. cheers marco
Marco,
Yes the 12-24mm f4. I love the WA but not the distortion.
Regarding the rear sync long exposure. It’s almost like taking two exposures at once. The length of the exposure is long enough to capture the ambient light (2sec), sky and the boats, while the two flashes light up the bride and groom. I meter the flash for the close subjects and allow the shutter speed to meter for the wider scene. Sometimes it works better then others.
The hard part is getting the bride and groom to stand still as it will soften the image. But the advantage is that there is some flexibility during the non flash periods as there generally isn’t enough light to show the bride and grooms slight movements.
Well that’s the idea anyway. Try it tonight on your car, or something that doesn’t move just after dusk. As long as the subject isn’t to far away, ie the flash will reach it, you can get some nice results. Moving subjects are harder. This is the basic premise behind this shot;

Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|