Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by meicw on Wed May 17, 2006 8:19 pm
Here are a couple I took at the Melb Zoo yesterday, using my new Sigma 50-500. I really love this lens. I cannot tell any difference in the sharpeness & resolution at any of the f stops. I would like to thank very much the members that suggested using the AE/AE lock button to focus. Since I have started using this button, my ratio of OOF shots has dropped remarkably.
Both these shots were spot metered, using manual mode, and the exposure adjusted -1/3 EV. The leaves shot is probably a bit ordinary.
Please tell me what you think, and how these can be improved. BTW, IF you have missed me, I havent been around lately because I have not been to well. On the mend now though.
Regards
meicw
 [/url]
-
meicw
- Member
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D
by moggy on Wed May 17, 2006 10:05 pm
I like both these shots, in particular the 2nd because of the colouring.
 Bob.
.
-

moggy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s
by sirhc55 on Wed May 17, 2006 11:18 pm
Someone had to make the Bigma sing and you have - both shots are very good 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by NJ on Thu May 18, 2006 8:30 pm
i actually prefer the second shot because of the colours, and it is so damn sharp! 
-

NJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Ringwood, Melbourne
by Zeeke on Thu May 18, 2006 9:40 pm
looks damn sharp.. i was looking at a 50-500 a while ago, went for the 70-200 instead
Love the sharpness of the bird... nice work
Did you use a tripod?
Tim
-

Zeeke
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, Qld, AU
-
by Slider on Thu May 18, 2006 10:23 pm
Nice and Sharp. Looks like an excellent addition to your kit 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by PiroStitch on Thu May 18, 2006 11:09 pm
Good to see you're back meicw. Hope you're feeling better after your rest.
Nice shots with the Bigma!
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Bodak on Fri May 19, 2006 7:41 am
I like your first shot of the bird but to my eye it is a tad flat..
I'm also happy that you have put this image taken with the 50-500 as it is on my lens lust list...
Is it ok if I have a play with the bird image..
Life is
Stephen
-
Bodak
- Member
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 5:31 pm
- Location: Somerville Victoria
by bindiblue on Fri May 19, 2006 8:32 am
Great shots,, I like them both they are so sharp,, #2 is my prefrence ,
Suzanne
Nikon D200, 24-120mm VR, 70-300 ED, SB800 flash, Manfrotto tripod,
-
bindiblue
- Member
-
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:23 pm
- Location: Caboolture Queensland
by Potatis on Fri May 19, 2006 6:16 pm
Wow! #1 was taken at 500mm, and it is so sharp... Now I'm very interested in this lens.
Doug C.
-
Potatis
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
- Location: Mosman
-
by marcotrov on Fri May 19, 2006 9:42 pm
The Big Ma shines in your hands. Both images are great.
cheers
marco
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by meicw on Sat May 20, 2006 9:57 pm
Thanks for all the replies. Stephen, I dont mind if you want to play with the 1st image. Tim, I used a monopod. I dont like to use a tripod at the Zoo, epecially on Tuesdays, which seems to be grades 1 & 2 day  .
I think that is a really great lens. The only shortcoming is that it is f6.3 at full zoom, so it can only really be used on fairly bright days, which we do get a lot of in OZ (even Melb  ) It compliments the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 nicely. This is another sharp lens.
I recommend both lenses highly.
Regards
meicw
-
meicw
- Member
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D
by Digidegs on Sun May 21, 2006 2:04 am
Nice shots and sharp. An under-rated lens this Bigma.
-

Digidegs
- Member
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:42 pm
- Location: Perth
by Bodak on Sun May 21, 2006 6:59 am
meicw wrote:Thanks for all the replies. Stephen, I dont mind if you want to play with the 1st image. Tim, I used a monopod. It compliments the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 nicely. This is another sharp lens.
I recommend both lenses highly.
Regards meicw
Meicw, I think you and the lens create a very nice song together and after having a play with the image I'm really impressed..
The lens at 500mm has picked up good detail..

Life is
Stephen
-
Bodak
- Member
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 5:31 pm
- Location: Somerville Victoria
by Manta on Sun May 21, 2006 8:35 am
Very nice meicw but the shots seem quite noisy - were you using a high iso?
-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by meicw on Sun May 21, 2006 3:14 pm
Stephen, Thanks for the adjusted iamge. You have brought out details that I didn't realise were there. If I may ask, what did you do?
Manta, to keep the shutter speeds up, I usually shoot at 400 or 800 at the Zoo.
Regards
meicw
-
meicw
- Member
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|